Lurifaks hos Lånekassa? (In Norwegian)

Nå ringte jeg lånekassa, noe som ikke er bare enkelt, fra Liverpool.

Det er sånn, at hvis man ringer nummeret som man er ment å ringe fra utlandet.

+47 22726700.

Da blir det bare brutt, dette nummeret kan man ikke ringe fra fasttelefon i Storbritannia.

(BT fasttelefon har jeg, BT er det største telefirmaet, såvidt jeg vet, British Telecom, eller noe).

Neida, man må ringe sentralbordet.

Men det første nummeret virker fra engelsk mobil (O2).

Men dette vet de ikke om, hos sentralbordet.

Jeg har ringt noen ganger nå.

Der sier de at grunnen er, at det er for mange i kø.

Men grunnen er nok at det er noe tull et sted, hos Lånekassa eller BT, eller hvem vet.

For det er jo mye dyrere å ringe fra mobil, enn fra fasttelefon.

For noen ganger må man jo vente 20-30 minutter kanskje, på å få svar.

Og hvis man da har 20-30 pund, i ringetid på mobilen, så tror jeg ikke det er så mye igjen av de pengene da, for å si det sånn.

Jeg ba om å få prate med en av lederne.

Men det gikk ikke, sa damen på sentralbordet.

Men jeg fikk snakke med en dame som het Quickstad vel.

Og hun tror jeg det var, som jeg snakket med, da jeg ringte Lånekassa fra Sunderland, i 2004.

Da ringte jeg i november eller desember, angående studielånet, som jeg helst skulle ha fått, i september, da studiene startet.

Men jeg fikk ikke lånet før i januar, fire måneder etter at studiene startet.

Så det var nok noe 'Kafka-kluss', eller hva man skal kalle det, hos Lånekassa i 2004, vil jeg tippe.

Men dette har jeg skrevet om på bloggen tidligere.

Men nå hadde det visst være noe Kafka-kluss iår og.

Jeg ringte Lånekassa i mars, og fikk beskjed om at det var lurt å sende faks, av en eller annen grunn.

Så jeg sendte dem en faks da, som kan finnes i denne linken, 31. mars:

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2009/03/jeg-lurer-pa-om-jeg-skal-studere-igjen.html

Den faksen hadde det visst blitt noe surr med.

Om den hadde blitt registrert som brev, eller noe.

Noe sånt.

Men det som var, var at der skrev jo jeg, i faksen, om at jeg pratet med en saksbehandler ifjor, og at

'Jeg ble forklart ifjor, at jeg kunne få studielån igjen hvis jeg kunne forklare forsinkelsen fra skoleåret 2004/05'.

Også sendte jeg med denne filen fra St. Hanshaugen trygdekontor, som forklarte forsinkelsen, (som jeg har forklart mer om hva problemene i Sunderland skyldtes, på bloggen tidligere):

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixqIRh8YdyRx96eFKfMzmL4LnGzCrw6hvnbP0bHAnhfCgppPhN_kNfAPbc43d0KY9FDXtVsDzanSSmsbGDGbaEzNl3Pe300mmw5VwFGq4ZHetNb_okC199MdAuDs3waUsgr63F-VfZ874/s1600-h/img178.jpg

Så sender en som heter Bakke, hos Lånekassa, dette brevet:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/37926197@N07/3492341226/

Hvor hun skriver blant annet:

'Vi viser til telefonsamtale uke 17, ditt brev mottatt 02.04.09 (Skal være faks fra 31. mars) og vårt brev av 16.04.09

I brevet ditt spør du om du kan ha rett til lån og stipend'.

Men jeg spør ikke om det i brevet (egentlig faksen).

Jeg forklarer at jeg har fått opplyst at jeg da vil ha rett til lån og stipend.

Dette spurte jeg om ifjor, som jeg forklarer i faksen.

Så dette var bare noe 'Goddag mann økseskaft-greier', fra Lånekassen.

Så dette skulle de se på nå, hun Quickstad som jeg pratet med idag, sa hun skjønte hva jeg mente, og skulle rydde opp i dette, sa hun.

(For hun Bakke hun bare ignorerte faksen min, og latet som om den samtalen jeg refererte til, da jeg ringte lånekassen ifjor, ikke hadde forekommet, i tillegg til at hun tulla angående det som stod i faksen).

Mens hun Bakke der, som skrev det nevnte brevet, hun tror jeg må ha lest for mye Kafka eller vært på for mange kommunist-møter, for å tulle litt.

Så Lånekassa, den er nok ganske full av kommunister, eller lignende, vil jeg si.

Så der er det nok mye lurifaks, for å si det sånn.

Så sånn er nok det.

Men det er bra at det virker som at noen er ordentlige der ihvertfall.

At det bare er noen 'dårlige epler' som ødelegger, kan man kanskje få inntrykk av.

Men studielån og slikt, er jo viktig, det kan jo ha betydning for en persons liv og karriære, om man får lån eller ikke.

Så her burde vel helst ting være i orden, skulle man tro.

Så sånn er nok det.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

De navnene her kjenner jeg også igjen fra militæret forresten.

Det var tillitsmann, fra Hedmark, (som avløste Torp, som hadde tulla med vaktlistene og ble avløst), Bakke.

Og det var også en lagfører, som det het, fra Oslo, som het Quickstad, som pleide å noen ganger havne i slåsskamp på byen, når han var ute med kamerater, mener jeg å huske at jeg overhørte at han sa en gang.

(At de pleide å banke opp folk på byen, mer eller mindre vel, var det vel jeg overhørte at han vel skrøyt om, til kameratene på lag 1, mens jeg tilfeldigvis gikk forbi der vel.

Eller, jeg fikk ikke lov å røyke, på rommet, hos lag 2, hvor jeg var etter nyttår, 1993.

Så jeg satt ofte på gangen der, og røyka en sneip, eller noe.

(For jeg prøvde å gå ned til en tipakning om dagen, for å spare penger, og fordi jeg tenkte jeg fikk dårlig kondis av å røyke for mye.

Men det var kjedelig i militæret, så det ble sånn at man ofte fikk lyst til å røyke, for det var lite annet å gjøre.

Så derfor røyka jeg en halv sigarett da, og sparte på sneipen.

Det var jo bare i militæret uansett, så jeg tok ikke det så nøye.

Men men.

Jeg slutta helt å røyke et år eller to etter militæret.)

Og Skjellum ville ikke ha kassettspiller, hos lag 2.

Så jeg pleide å høre på musikken de spilte hos lag 1.

De hadde forresten også en av mine kassetter, som de pleide å spille.

Jeg sa ikke noe om det, men den 2. eller 3. gangen, som jeg syntes at jeg hørte det her, da sa jeg fra da.

Så tok jeg tilbake kassetten, da jeg var helt sikker på at det var min kassett da.

Så derfor satt jeg vel mellom lag 1 og lag 2 og røyka, for jeg syntes at f.eks. lagfører Warming og Torp, på lag 3, at de var litt 'svette', og også Randen.

Så lag 3, dem var liksom ikke så kule da, så dem holdt jeg meg litt unna.

Mens på lag 1, der spilte dem kul musikk og dem var ganske joviale, mange av dem da.

Så da blei det vel til at jeg heller satt nærmere døra til lag 1 og røyka, enn til døra til lag 3.

Jeg var ganske sliten på slutten av året og etter vinterøvelse osv., så jeg var ikke helt på høyden, før våren, da våkna jeg litt igjen.

Så sånn var det).

Og han var ganske høy og kraftig, (Quickstad), så han var nok ikke den enkleste å havne i slåsskamp mot, i Oslo, vil jeg tippe.

Så sånn var nok det.

Mens han Bakke, han var ikke så kraftig, men han var liksom sånn tilbakelent, og hadde kontrollen da.

Han hadde litt firkanta hue og briller.

Men han var nestlagfører i kanonlaget, mener jeg å huske, og kanskje like sindig som lagføreren der, Davidsen.

Men han Bakke var også litt barnslig, jeg husker han tulla med meg, fordi jeg jobba på Rimi, når vi hadde perm, tror jeg, og ropte en linje fra en sang, sånn at jeg skulle høre det, 'the workaholic', som for å mobbe meg, en 90-talls sang.

Så kanskje Bakke er i noe Stay Behind/mafian, og driver og tuller med meg?

Hva vet jeg.

Noe er det som foregår ihvertfall.

Og som jeg kan huske det, så begynte tullingen, mot meg, i militæret og etter militæret, stort sett.

Da jeg dro på arbeidsformidlingen etter militæret, på Stovner, sommeren 1993, så ble jeg skikkelig tulla med, av en saksbehandler der, som mobba meg, og sa jeg var 'fersk' (et militært mobbeutrykk) på arbeidsmarkedet, enda jeg hadde jobbet i tre år, hvorav et år heltid.

Og han registrerte meg som ADB-kyndig og ikke EDB-kyndig på arbeidsformidlingens datasystem, så man kunne mistenke at han prøvde å hindre meg i å bli kontaktet når noen prøvde å få tak i folk med EDB-utdannelse.

(ADB, administrativ databehandling, var et uttrykk som nok ikke så mange brukte, eller kjente til).

Så her er det nok noe enda mer dyptliggende lurifaks, som ligger i bakgrunnen.

Det er nok ikke umulig.

Nå driver folka hos Lånekassa og agerer kommunister. (In Norwegian)

PS.

Jeg kan forklare hva jeg mener.

Jeg tar et punkt av gangen.


Punkt 1

Der står det at jeg må dokumentere å ha tatt 51 studiepoeng, etter skoleåret 2004/05.

Men det er ikke sant.

Nå var det jo sånn, som jeg har skrevet om på bloggen, at jeg fikk ødelagt trynet og overhørte at jeg var forfulgt av noe 'mafian', i 2003.

Og pga. dette så hadde jeg litt problemer da jeg studerte i Sunderland, i skoleåret 2004/05.

Så dro jeg til onkelen min og dem, seinere i 2005, og de fikk overtalt meg til å søker om noe attføringspenger.

Og da fikk jeg avslått den søknaden, fra St. Hanshaugen trygdekontor, men de sa at de var enige i at problemene var reelle, at jeg kunne ha blitt sykmeldt, men de sa at jeg ikke fikk attføring, siden jeg hadde vært i fult studier osv.

Så sendte jeg den til Lånekassa, i begynnelsen av denne måneden.

Også sier Lånekassa at jeg må dokumentere at jeg har tatt 51 studiepoeng etter 2004/05.

Men det er helt feil.

For jeg har ikke studert etter 2004/05.

Og jeg var mindre enn et år forsinket da jeg begynte å studere i Sunderland, så jeg fikk studielån i skoleåret 2004/05.

Og nå har jeg et dokument som viser at jeg hadde gyldig forklaring for det skoleåret.

Så da skulle jeg være tilbake, i samme situasjon, som før jeg begynte å studere i Sunderland.

Så da skulle ikke jeg trenge noen 51 studiepoeng.

Jeg skulle vært innenfor grensen for forsinkelse.

Så det her er bare tull.


Punkt 2

De sier at jeg må betale regninger, for studielån, siden 2005.

Men det er også feil.

For jeg ringte ifjor, og forklarte dem om situasjonen min.

Og de fikk et brev fra en sosionom, som onkelen min i Kvelde rådet meg til å kontakte, i 2005.

Og jeg forklarte dem om dette, da jeg ringte ifjor, at jeg har kontaktet Larvik kommune, om gjeldsrådgivning, og tar alt sånt gjennom dem.

Og at jeg har vært i en vanskelig sitasjon i utlandet, uten fasttelefon osv., i begynnelsen her i England, så derfor har jeg tatt alt sånn gjennom Larvik kommune.

Men, dette forklarte jeg de om ifjor, da jeg ringte.

Både punkt 1 og 2.

Men nå begynner de 'skrullene' hos Lånekassa, og hakke om de samme tingene igjen.

Så det er bare piss fra Lånekassa det her.

Det burde ikke være nødvendig å gå igjennom den samme svadaen, hver gang man kontakter dem.

Så her er det noe Siste Sovjetstat-greier, som foregår, hos Lånekassa.

Så sånn er nok det.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

PS 2.

Her kan man se, at jeg forklarte om alt dette, i faksen jeg sendte Lånekassa, for noen uker siden.

Så Lånekassa driver bare å dikter opp nå:

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2009/03/jeg-lurer-pa-om-jeg-skal-studere-igjen.html

Jeg lurer på om jeg skal studere igjen, siden noen tuller med jobbmulighetene mine. Jeg hadde problemer med noe sånn 'mafian'-stress da jeg studerte

PS.

Her står det mer om dette, at noen tuller med jobbmulighetene mine:

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2009/03/hvorfor-jeg-ikke-far-meg-jobb-in.html

PS 2.

Det står søknaden din om rehabiliterinspenger, fra 28. juli 2005.

Men da var ikke jeg i Norge.

Jeg dro til Kristiansand, 25. juli 2005.

Og til Hirtshals, 26. juli 2005.

(Jeg husker det, for jeg har bursdag, 25. juli).

Og siden 26. juli 2005, så har ikke jeg vært i Norge.

Jeg får sende det her til politiet tror jeg.

Vi får se.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

Mer om problemer med HiO og lånekassa i forbindelse med studier i Sunderland. (In Norwegian).

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/group.php?gid=50881372989&ref=nf

Tull med lånekassa. (In Norwegian).

Jeg ringte lånekassa nå, for jeg skulle sjekke opp noe greier, med hvor mye jeg var forsinket hos dem osv.

Men da sa de at jeg bare kunne vise frem resultater, for tre semestre.

Men det er løgn.

For jeg har studert fire år i Norge.

To år på Norges Høyskole for Informasjonsteknologi.

Og to år ved Høyskolen i Oslo, Ingeniørhøyskolen, bachelor informatikk.

Og da hadde ikke hun dama, papirene fra NHI i systemet.

For jeg tok 33 vekttall, av 40, på to skoleår, 1989/90 og 1991/92.

Og de papirene lå i kofferten min, som lå igjen hos onkelen min, da jeg ble jaget derfra i 2005.

Karakterutskrifter fra NHI osv.

Men de har da antagelig blitt fjernet, fra Lånekassa sitt system.

For jeg hadde resultater fra fire semestre ved NHI også.

Og jeg hadde resultater fra tre semestre ved HiO.

Det ene semesteret ved HiO, høsten 2003.

Da hadde jeg to jobber, og var overarbeidet etter Rimi, jeg jobba mye sommeren 2003, og kjøpte ny laptop, høsten 2003.

Men den laptopen ble forsinka, og jeg brukte mye tid, på å installere Unix, på laptopen.

Og jeg hadde også windows på den laptopen, så jeg hadde en dual-bot, på den pc-en, en toshiba laptop.

Men den pc-en måtte jeg levere på reperasjon.

Og det var noe problemer med gruppearbeidet på skolen, i det faget.

Men jeg lærte unix da, for jeg installerte det på pc-en hjemme.

Så det var ikke sånn at jeg ikke lærte noe.

Men jeg tok det litt roligere det halvåret, fordi jeg var rimelig utslitt etter all jobbingen på Rimi osv.

Jeg ble drevet som en slave, av han nye butikksjefen på Rimi Bjørndal bl.a.

Men jeg hadde jo 33 vekttall, fra NHI, fra før.

Så jeg hadde blant annet, en del av fagene fra 3. semesteret på HiO.

Og det ble noe kluss med Unix-eksamen, at vi skulle ta den etter nyttår, eller noe, jeg og en kamerat.

Noe var det.

Så jeg hadde ingen eksamner et halvår, men det var fordi jeg jobbet mye, i to jobber, og ble slavedrevet, må man si, av butikksjefen på Rimi Bjørndal.

Og det var liksom bare unix, som var det ordentlige faget, det halvåret.

Og det ble det noe forsinkelser av, med gruppearbeidet.

Jeg og Dagga, han vokalisten i en gruppe fra Hamar.

Rougseth, hva het den gruppa da.

Jeg fant det ikke på internett nå.

Men det dukka opp, at han hadde regisert en film, på 90-tallet, sammen med Wam, fra Wam og Vennerød.

Det visste jeg ikke.

Men vi var på gruppe i første klasse, med en pen dame, fra Vestlandet.

Og hun dro tilbake dit, etter første året.

For kameraten til typen hennes, ble drept med kniv, i Pilestredet, hvis jeg skjønte det riktig.

Det var i nyhetene da, det var vel våren 2003, kan jeg tenke meg.

Så vi var egentlig ikke så helt med, da tredje semesteret begynte.

For da måtte vi finne nye folk å samarbeide med osv., så det gikk litt trådt.

Så det ble bare sånn alt ikke gikk som det skulle, det tredje semesteret.

Men jeg tok et eller to fag ekstra, i fjerde semester.

Så jeg var innenfor grensa, for å få studielån, da jeg dro til Sunderland.

Og jeg hadde kontroll på utdanningsgraden, for jeg hadde jo 33 vekttall fra datahøyskole fra før, fra NHI.

Så det var ikke noe krise uansett.

Men når hun dama hos lånekassa, sier at jeg kun kunne vise til resultater for tre semestre, så var ikke det riktig.

Jeg kunne vise til resultater for syv semestre fra høyskole, og seks halvår fra videregående, da jeg også fikk stipend osv.

Så det var bare det tredje semesteret ved HiO, som jeg ikke kunne vise til resultater for.

Men da var det altså flere ting, som klikka samtidig, men det var altså ikke noe krise, siden jeg hadde så mange vekttall i data fra før osv.

Så sånn var det.

Men de papirene fra NHI, de synes litt som synket i jorden.

For jeg har ikke klart å få tak i de, fra NHI nå, og ikke fra HiO, og ikke fra University of Sunderland.

Enda alle disse, har fått de papirene, såvidt jeg husker.

Og heller ikke fra Samordna opptak.

Og ikke fra familien min, fra morssiden, onkelen min i Kvelde osv., som har kofferten min, med vitnemål og karakterutskrifter fra NHI og HiO osv.

Så her virker det som at det må være minst en og helt sikkert flere ugler begravet i mosen, eller hva man skal si.

Så sånn er det.

PS.

Her er han Dagga, fra HiO, det han som var vokalisten i det her bandet fra Hamar osv., Autopulver het det bandet:



(Jeg husker dessverre ikke navnet på hun pene dama som vi var på gruppe med i første klasse, men sånn er det man kan ikke huske alt. Og hun hadde jo type og.

Og jeg var rimelig nede de første semesterne på HiO, pga. problemene i Rimi osv., så det var ikke alt jeg fikk med meg.

Så sånn var det).

Politi som tulla med studielånet mitt. (In Norwegian).

Jeg tror det var politi jeg, som tulla med studielånet mitt, da jeg studerte i Sunderland, sånn at jeg mista kontrollen på økonomien osv.

Så politi veit ikke hva dem driver med, og sitter med hue oppi ræva og driver å kødder med vanlige folk.

Sånn er det jeg ser det i hvertfall.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

More about the 'magic' automated reply from the CAB Chief Executive.

In the independant CAB adjunctants report, regarding the CAB-case, it says this, regarding the 'magic' automated reply:

16. On 5 and 27 July, the client e-mailed the complaints officer to

say he had received no answer from the bureau. On 3 and 22

August, the client e-mailed the chief executive of Citizens

Advice to say he had received no answer. The first

communication he received after the complaints officer‘s e-mail

of 31 May was an automated reply from the chief executive‘s

office on 22 August saying that he would be away from the

office until 30 August.

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2008/04/report-from-cab-case-independant.html

I'll write the sentence in bold again, so that it's more overviewable:

On 3 and 22 August, the client e-mailed the chief executive of Citizens

Advice to say he had received no answer.

This isn't right at all. I sent the e-mails on 3 and 16 August, like can be seen in this blog-post, that contains the e-mail from 16/8, in a forwarded e-mail, to a manager/director at the CAB head office, sent earlier this year:

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2008/02/enclosure-1-e-mail-to-cab-252.html

And here is a link to the 'magic' automated reply:

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2008/02/enclosure-2-e-mail-to-cab-252.html

One can read above, that the independant CAB adjunctant writes this, in her report:

The first communication he received after the complaints officer‘s e-mail
of 31 May was an automated reply from the chief executive‘s office on 22 August saying that he would be away from the office until 30 August.

I wrote the date in bold, thats 22 August.

So this, the 'magic' automated reply, is waiting for six days, from Thurday 16 August 2007 to Wednesday 22 August (I checked the days in my calender, or what it's called again), before it thinks it's about time, to send itself, to my e-mail address.

So I don't know what the 'magic' automated reply was doing in the meantime.

What was the automated reply, doing on Friday 17 August, Saturday 18 August, Sunday 19 August, Monday 20 August and Tuesday 21 August?

Was it AWOL, or what it's called again?

I think this is very strange.

Shouldn't the CAB head-office, keep better track of their automated replies?

And not let them use six days, before they reach the right e-mail address.

When I recieved the magic automated reply, I didn't read it that properly, I was a bit stressed.

I thought it was a normal e-mail.

Since I was reading it in a break from work.

So I didn't really note, that it claimed to be an automated reply.

I thought at first, when I was a bit tired, when I read the e-mail, that it was a proper e-mail of some type.

Sent by a human.

Since, it didn't cross my mind, that it could have been an automated reply, when I recieved it, almost a week after I sent the reminder e-mail, on 16/8.

So I thought that this had been looked at, by the CAB Chief Executive.

So when I, a couple of weeks later, recieved the stage 1 report, from the Liverpool Central CAB, then I thought this was because the Chief Executive had looked at this.

And therefore, I wasn't really sure if I should complain, about the stage 1 report.

Since it seemed to me, that the CAB Chief Executive, had already involved himself, in the complain-process.

So that it had really, already, been at the top-level of the organisation.

So I had to think a while about this, because at first, then I thought it would be inpolite of me to complain, about the stage 1 report, since the Chief Executive, seemingly to me, had been involved in getting the stage 1 report, or at least getting it sent.

But I decieded later, to complain to the Chair, like the representative is called, there.

But due to this, that the 'magic' automated reply, at first, seemed to me, to be sent by a person, indicating, that the Chief Executive there, had directly or indirectly, involved himself in the complaint process.

Then I at first decided not to complain.

I decided to post about it on the BBC message-board, I think it was, or possibly another message-board, in Scandinavia.

And after looking more about this, in connection with the posting on the message-board, then I decided to complain.

I think it was then I discovered that the 'magic' reply, claimed to be 'automatic'.

But, now, I suspect, that this was done this way, deliberatly.

Like I wrote, in the answer to the CAB-case independant adjunctant:

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2008/04/from-eribsskoggmail_24.html

I think there has been some type of Police surveilance operation around me, since I reported to the St. Ann St. Police, in 2005, that I had overheard, that I was being followed by the 'mafia', and that I was being chased away from my uncles farm in Larvik, in Norway, some days earlier, by some people with guns and dogs.

(It's possible, that I didn't get to explain this much, since the Police didn't want to listen to my explanation, since they didn't want to be involved, like I overheard the Police-officer, telling his collegues, in the office they have, in conection, with the reception there.

And then they sent me out, after handing me a folder, and telling me to come back, if something actually had been going on).

I didn't really know to say then.

So I said, that I couldn't go back if I was dead, I'm not sure if I understood exactly what he meant.

Like I understood it, I could only go back, if someone had actually succeded in killing or injuring me.

I'm not sure if this is exactly what they meant.

But the Police-officer, was very young and tense.

And I was stressed from being chased.

So I just said that I couldn't go back if I was dead, because what the Police-officer said, didn't make any sence to me.

And I didn't think it was any point in trying to reason, since I had already overheard, that they didn't want to be involved.

So I just went out from there, with the folder, with the phone-number on it, even if how the Police were reasoning, surrounding this, seemed a bit unclear to me.

And back to the CAB-case.

I suspect, that the Streat Theater operation, that it seems to me, that the strange incidents on the Liverpool Central CAB, on 5/4, last year was.

I suspect, that this Street Theater operation, could be a part of, a surveilance operation, from the British Police, that started after I went to the Police-station in St. Ann's St. in Liverpool, in July/August 2005.

Or, really, I suspect it started before this, since there was something going on, in London, when I went there, in February 2005, from Sunderland, where I was studying the third year of my Bachelor Computing degree, on the University there.

There was some strange things going on then, so it could be, that the British Police, knew about what went on in Oslo, in 2003 and 2004, since it seemed to me, that the whole city there, knew about what went on then.

Even if I myself, didn't know exactly what went on, other than the things I had overheard at work, and more, which I have explained a bit about, in this blog-post:

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2008/02/lack-of-openness-from-government.html

So it seemed clear to me, that something serious, to do with some 'mafia' etc, was going on in Oslo, even if I can't say that I had been doing anything wrong.

But, at first, I wasn't sure, if this was known about, in Britain.

I didn't really think, that people in eg. London, cared that much about what went on in Oslo.

Since London, is obviously a very large city.

But, something strange, went on there as well, but I'm not sure exactly, what went on.

But people acted very strange there, and from what I overheard there, some mafia or mob-stuff went on.

Eg. I went to Harrods once, and then I overheard, that someone called someone else, from a mobile-phone, and said, he isn't just staying at the hotel, now he is on Harrods.

So I thought this was very strange.

I wasn't sure exactly, why someone would call like this.

And several other, more or less, similar incidents, happened there, which I now suspect that maybe could be linked with what went on in Oslo, even if it also could have been, for some reason, not linked with the problems in Oslo.

I'm not used with things to do with mob/mafia, or what the right term is, so I can't really say this for sure.

But, in the end, I thought, many people in London, acted very stale when they saw me, and I overheard, someone talking outside the room which I rented on the hotel.

So, I decieded to go to some other place than London, which I had really planned to try to find an appartment and job, in.

Since, from what I had heard, from before this, it would be easier, to find a job in, in eg. computing, or shop-management, which I had worked with from before, than in Sunderland.

The study abroad advisor, on my home university in Oslo, HiO, Frode something, had a British friend/collegue, from Sunderland, who said in a meeting in Oslo, some months before I went to Sunderland, that it was almost imposible, to find a job there.

So that's one of the reasons, that I decided to go to London, to try to find a job, since my studies, were very delayed, due to some problems, with my study-finance, from Lånekassa, being four or five months delayed, even if HiO had told me, that they would send an aplication for me, in the spring of 2004.

And HiO, also, at first, wouldn't approve my modules there,

(I needed HiO, to approve the modules there, to get the study-founding from the Norwegian Government Study Finance Programme, Lånekassa. Around February of 2004, I think it was, I delivered two Study Abroad applications, to HiO.

One Erasmus-programme application (I had some loans since I had a lot of problems wih my car in Oslo, which I bought, when I was promoted to Rimi grocery store manager, in 1998. And the car was often broken in to, about three times a year I'd guess, and there were a lot of problems with the enigine and the electric system and more, so I guess I should have checked the car better before I bought it, but I had set aside some founds for repairs, like I had told my friend Magne Winnem, so I thought I was covered).

So the Erasumus programme grant, would have helped me paying the bills, for the loans.

I hadn't imagined that the founding from Lånekassa, would be so many months delayed, because I seemed to remember, that the applications there, were quite quickly processed, if one sent them, after the peek-season, since I half remebered this, from when I had sent an application to them, some years earlier. At least I this was how I remebered, that the system there worked, since not very many applications were sent them, after the automn-term had started.

But, HiO, said, that, since there was a module I hadn't taken the exam in.

(I was a bit overworked, after the years working as a Rimi grocery store manager, and the part-time job, as team-leader on Rimi Bjørndal, was very tirering, since the two store-managers working there, both put on a lot of pressure on me, even if I was only working two shifts a week.

My Area Manager there, Skodvin, asked me if I could work a shift in another shop, Rimi Langhus, which was having a kind of 'war' then, between the store manager then, Brun, and the staff.

I said that was alright, and then they needed a team-leader there, so I said that I could work there one shift a week.

So then I was working three shifts a week, as team-leader, in two different Rimi Shops.

Since I wanted to be cover my back, since I didn't get on that well, with any of the store-managers I had when I was working as a team-leader, while studyin full time, Computing/Bachelor Information Technology, on HiO (Oslo Universtiy College), in 2002-2004.

I was used to not putting that much pressure, on the Team-Leaders, when I was working as a store-manager myself.

Since I understood, that they had a lot of other things going on in their lifes, and really were just working, so that the store-manager, and the assisting store-manager, could have their rest-days.

So I couldn't understand, why they were putting so much work on me, I had to run around there, all the time, especially on Rimi Bjørndal, which is a busy shop, with a lot of customers, and low avarage spending for each customer, which means that the shop had to have more customers, to have the same income, that most other Rimi shops, but there wasn't more money spent to use on salaries, so there was more work for each person, and I thougt I got a bit more than my share of the extra work, since the manager there, put on a lot of pressure, regarding what I had to do, on eg. the busy Saturday late shift, which I worked every week. And this was not negoable. I was really on my way out of Rimi, I had just agreed to have a part-time job, so that I could keep my Rimi-flat, untill I had got å new job, in eg. management in a computing-firm, or as self-employed in computing.

So I tried to cover my back, by getting a second team-leader Rimi job, in case the problems with the Rimi Bjørndal store-manager, would escalate into some kind of constructed dismissal, or something like this.

I didn't really get on that well with the Area Manager eighter, she was a bit stale, and difficult to communitate with sometimes, and she withdrew the plan b arrangement, I had made, that I could start as store-manager again, if plan a, to work as a manager in a computing firm etc, for some reason failed.

The years I had been working as a Rimi store-manager, in 1998-2002, in three different stores, had been very eventful, with a lot of conflicts etc.

For some reason.

And in one shop, Rimi Kalbakken, I got the store assistants, against me, so I had to almost keep the shop, myself, it seemed to me, for about half a year there.

And it was a big shop, with a weekly income, of around 700.000 NOK, which is about £70.000.

So it was a lot of work, and a lot of conflicts.

And before I started there, I had been managing a smaller store, Rimi Nylænde, where there had been a lot of robberies, and projects, like starting with the Government lottery, Norsk Tipping, moving the fruit-department, chaning the freezers and the chlling-machines.

And some conflicts etc.

I had before this, from 1993-1998, been working on very low Rimi team-leader, and assisting manager salaries.

So, when I finally got a decent salary, I thought it was fun to do something else than just working in Rimi.

In the years 1993-1998, a large part of my life, was working on Rimi, and learning to run a Rimi store.

Even if I was working quite a lot, and I was a lot on the internet etc, to relax and recover from the stess in the store.

So, I hadn't been having a very good economy, in the first years of the nineties.

Since the Rimi store-manager assistant salaries then, were so low, that they were writen about, on the front-pages, of the national newspapers in Norway.

But in the first years of the nineties, Norway was recovering from a recession.

And since I had started working in Rimi, I thought it would be smart to have it on my CV, that I had worked as a store manager also, and not only as an assistant.

Since I thought it would be valuable, to have that on my CV, that would give a better impression then I reconed, and people I spoke with about this, also thought this.

And in 1998, my mother lent me some money, around £1000, to go to a Microsoft NT 3.0 or 4.0, I guess it was, course, for a week, in a holiday from Rimi, which my mate, Magne Winnem, who worked as a lecturer in Computing, had recomended me to take.

To get a computing-job, which I thought seemed tempting, since I had been working for more than two years, as a store manager assistant, on Rimi Bjørndal, with a lot of routine-work then.

But then, when I had finished the one week NT course, at Global Knowledge Network, in Skullerud, in Oslo, around February 1998.

Then I thought I could ask the Area Manager, Skodvin, if there was any future for me, in Rimi, before I started appying for computer jobs.

Since I hadn't really written any job-applications and dealt with things like that, for many years, and the work on Rimi Bjørndal, was very high-tempo, I worked all of the late shifts, so I thought that I would maybe be a bit bored, working in an office, after working so many years in a shop, with a lot of people around.

And I was used to working with almost only very beautiful young women, at Rimi Bjørndal, the last year I worked there. I was managing maybe five or six almost only very beautiful women, for some reason, on the late-shifts there, so I was also a bit worried, that I would maybe be a bit restless, if I should start working in an office, with programming etc, since I was used to working with a lot of pretty women around me all the time, on Rimi Bjørndal, in 1997 and 1998.

So I asked the Area-Manager, first, before I started to apply to computing-jobs, if she thought I had a future in Rimi, as a store-manager.

Then, she discussed this, with the Bjørndal store-manager, Kvehaugen, and then I heard she said to him, that I guess we have to give him a chance now.

Then I had been working as a Rimi store-managing assistant, for more than four years on a low salary, so I thought it was about time, to get some progress, on my work-situation.

Then I was offered Rimi Nylænde.

I was a bit disapointed, since I thought it would be a bigger store, Munkelia. (With more probably more women working in it, since I was very used to having a lot women around me at work all time. It almost made me crazy sometimes, with all the pretty women there).

But I knew Rimi Nylænde well from working there for two or three years from before, so in that perspective, it was an fine store to manage).

But there were a lot of things always happening, conflicts etc., in the three stores I had been working as a manager in.

And i was really tired, from working more than two years, with all the late-shifts, from the very busy Rimi Bjørndal shop, with all the work, the store manager there, Kvehaugen, put on me, while I was working there, in the years before starting working as a store-manager, in 1998.

So the three years working as a store-manager, really go to me.

Especially, the eight months or so, at Rimi Kalbakken, one of the largest Rimi shops in Oslo, where there were problems with the store-assistants etc.

But I thought it would be very embarrasing, to not sucseed managing a big store, so I went on, trying to keep the shop, at least the fruit-department, and chilled food department, myself, for many months, which was tirering, since it was a big shop, and I was tired from the years before in Rimi.

And there was a war with the assistant there, and the Area-manager, etc.

But then, Skodvin, offered me to start managing Rimi Langhus, in Ski municipality, south of Oslo.

A shop, that had a weekly income, in between, of Rimi Nylænde (in the Oslo township Lambertseter), and Rimi Kalbakken.

But the shop was challenging to run, in the way, that the shop-area, was really much to small, for the weekly income, and number of customers a day there.

So it was challenging, with the orders, and the logistics etc, since the non-shoping areas also were really to small there.

But this shop, Rimi Langhus, was very poorly run, from before, from a customer-perspective, I think one have to say.

Since the campaigns looked very poor, the fruit was almost always poorly presented, and goods were often sold out etc.

And I had been working several years, in another Rimi shop, Rimi Nylænde, which was quite similar, in the way that it was a bit worn down shop, that we succeded, in getting a better standard at, I think one can say.

So I felt a bit at home at Rimi Langhus, since I was so used with working as a manager, on Rimi Nylænde.

So even if I was very tired, when I was working at Rimi Langhus, and really only worked there, to get control of my economy, to get a job outside of Rimi, since I had totally lost faith in the Higher Management in the Rimi head-office, since I thought there had been a lot of unprofessional errors from them, regarding how I was explained to run Rimi Kalbakken etc., which created a lot of the problems I had been having there.

And I had had enough of problems with conflicts etc., so I tried to manage Rimi Langhus, in a way, that I let the assistant manager, get a lot of responsibility for the mangement of the shop.

I tried to ask the staff, what the store-manager work-tasks where.

So that the staff shouldn't be to stressed, from a new store-manager working there.

Since you don't wont unrest among the staff, at least not, if you are very tired from before, and don't want to work a lot of extra shifts, due to staff calling in sick etc.

And also, because I thought this was a good way of managing the shop, to include the other the other managers and staff, with manager-meetings, and staff-meetings.

This was also how the previous manager had been running the shop, it seemed to me.

And the staff there, were quite wary, on the Area Manager, and people that weren't from Langhus, I thought it seemed, so I chose to have a quite democratic management style, when I was working there.

But I had learned a bit about runing food-shops, from the seven or eight years as a Rimi manager, from before I started working on Rimi Langhus.

And this was a lot more than the previous manager had been working, since he was on a programme in Rimi, to work at the head-office, and working out in the field, as a store-manager, for one year, was part of this trainee-program.

So even if I didn't change any of the rutines, on Rimi Langhus etc.

Since I reset myself, and tryed to take the approach, that if it isn't broken, don't try to fix it.

Even so, the results in the shop, improved, since I tryed to put empasis on the general shop-work.

Like trying to put up fruit better, and improve that department, since this deparment, had had a low standard, from before.

And the same with the campaigns there etc.

And also, in the summer of 2001, I got some of the part time team-leaders, to do work like rearrange the shelves in the shops, after 'planograms', which where drawings, from the head office, which are constructed in a way, that the goods in the shop earn most money on, are given more and better shelf-place.

So that building the shelfs, according to the 'planograms' make sure the profit of the shop, and placing of the goods, is optimised.

And then the own-label goods sold percentage increased.

The fruit sold percentage of the total income increased.

And the avarage amount sold pr. customer increased.

So in the last half of 2001, the shop won the Rimi managemnet prize, 'Rimi Gullårer', as one of only three shops, of maybe 100 or so, in the greater Oslo Area.

Even I was very tired and overworked this year.

So that was a bit fun.

But I had been working hard on Rimi Langhus also, since I didn't want to disapoint the staff and the customers there, since I had overheard that some of the staff/customers, were dispointed in me there, since the shop wasn't looking that fine, after I had been working there for maybe a month, since the Area-manager, I think it must have been, had promised them, that the shop-standard would improve, when I started working there, since the shop-standard had improved, when I managed Rimi Nylænde, a year or two before this.

But in the mean-time, I had been very over-worked at Rimi Kalbakken.

But I thought it wouldn't be very fun, thinking back on, that I had in a way, let down, Rimi Langhus, so I tried to do a good job, with improving the shop-standard etc. there).

So I finally had arranged, to start studying again, in the automn of 2002, than I was very tired and overworked, and a bit depressed due to problems at Rimi Kalbakken, and it was embarrasing, to tell my family and friens, that I was going to start studying again, since they didn't really know how it was, to work with all the conflicts etc, in the big shop, Rimi Kalbakken, since this was really tirering, working there, since I don't really like to quit, when I've set myself a target, so then I just goes on.

But in the end, I had to give up there, because, trying to run such a big shop, when you're not on level terms with the staff, assistant managers and head-office managers and directors, that isn't very easy.

So I don't think I could have lasted much longer, coping with working there, it was like in a stale-mate there, so it was really, eighter me who had quit, or all of the other employees and managers, that had to quit.

And then it really made more sense, that I quit, so I agreed to this, after working there for eight or nine months.

But then, after starting studying again, in 2002, I was a bit tired, and I needed to get my spirits up a bit, since I was a bit down, after the last seven or eight years with problems with the other managers in Rimi.

But I had been studying computers from before, for two years, at University-level, in 1989-1990, and in 1991-1992.

So I had some back-up.

So that I could relax a bit, and try recover from all the years working very hard in Rimi.

I wanted to organise it this way, since I thought I was to overworked to start a new career right away.

I needed a couple of years, with a bit lower tempo, to get recovered again, I reckoned.

But the Rimi store-managers, on Rimi Bjørndal and Rimi Langhus, they put much more pressure on me, than I had done, towards the team-leaders, when I was working as a store-manager.

And in the summer of 2002, I was working 16 hour shifts, on Rimi Bjørndal, since the other manger there, called in sick, while the store-manager was on holiday.

So, I was studying a bit from home, and didn't go to all the lectures, since I had had much of the same lectures from before, some ten years or more before this.

Except that this degree, was a three year degree, and not a two year one, like the one I had almost finished, from before.

So, since I had quite a lot of responsibility, in the two Rimi team-leader jobs, and since I thought I should try to wind down a bit, for a year or two.

Then, it was an examn, that I hadn't taken, in the first year of the studies, I think it must have been.

And then, I couldn't participate, in the Erasmus programme HiO said, since I didn't have the theoretical basis, that I should have had, after two years.

I explained, that I had this module, form NHI, and that this was why I hadn't taken the examn on HiO.

But then they found anohter reason, not to give me the Erasmus scholarship.

And then, I complained on this, but then they found a third reason, not to give me the Erasums scholarship.

But, I knew, that I had also applied, on just a regular study abroad place.

But this application, had been lost, by HiO, they told me, around May or June 2004,
when I had recieved the last rejection for the Erasmus-programme scholarship.

Before this, around April 2004, a HiO Bislet International Office representative, a woman with a lot of empty 1.5 litre Tab X-tra bottles, placed in a row, in her office at Bislet, told me, that she would deliver my Lånekassa, study abroad application, since she said that this more complicated, than a normal Lånekassa application.

I couldn't think of any reason why I shouldn't let her do this, if she wanted to do this, so said this was alright, and counted on that the issues with the study finance aplication, was sorted.

After HiO told me, in May or June 2004, that they couldn't see that they had received my plan-b application, a regular study abroad application (as a back up, in case my Erasmus programme application was rejected for any, more or less, buraucratic reason, which sometimes happen in Norway).

Then I searched on the internet.

And it turned out, that there was an organisation, in the center of Oslo, called IEC (Now Kilroy education), in Nedre Slottsgate, in Oslo.

They had an agreement with the University of Sunderland.

And, since it was already June, and much to late, to start the HiO application process, and since they were very buraucratic, and they seemed to have a dislike towards me, or that I should study abroad.

Since the study abroad manager there, also had brought a friend from Sunderland, to a meeting there, to get me, it seemed to me, to not go there, to study.

And due to the mentioned problems with the Erasmus-programme applicatons.

Due to these problems, I didn't it would be possible, to get HiO to get me to Sunderland, after they had lost my plan-b application, the regular study abroad application.

So I contacted IEC, one day, around June 2004, on my way to work, as a team-leader on Rimi Langhus.

And they helped me.

They contacted University of Sunderland.

I enlosed the grade-overviews, from both NHI, and Oslo University College/HiO, and then, I was admited, to a place, on the third year of the regular Bachelor Computing study there.

Since the University of Sunderland, thought I had the qualifications, with the exams I had from Norway, to start directly on the third year there.

So then I would have got a British bachelor degree, in computing, if I had finnished the third-year modules there.

So there shouldn't really be any reason for HiO, to make a fuzz about this.

Since this was organised on the regular study abroad programme.

And, even if I didn't get an Erasmus scholarhip.

Even so, the Norwegian study-finance programme, Lånekassa, is quite good, and the living expenses low in the north of Britain, like the International Office representative, with all the empry Tab X-tra bottles, had told me, a couple of months before.

And I had all the theory I needed to participate on the third year of the Bachelor programme there, like if I had been a regulare student studying the first two years in Sunderland on schedule.

So there shouldn't have been any reason for HiO, and the study abroad manager there, Frode, not to autorise me studying there, and not to autorise the modules there.

Which I needed, to get the Lånekassa founding.

I needed the HiO study abroad managers approval to get the Lånekassa founding.

But there shouldn't have been any reason for him to deny me this.

He had made enough problems for me, from before, with the three aplications for the Erasmus schoolarship, being turned downed by the department he was responsible for.

But, the HiO study abroad manager, wouldn't accept my modules there, before after, the University of Sunderland study abroad office staff, had let me borrow their phone, and call HiO, from their offices.

And this was maybe in November, two months after my studies there had started.

Something like this.

Then he finally accepted the modules.

He was over in Sunderland, for some reason, and then I met him, in a meeting at the University there, and then he accepted the modules, a couple of months late.

And then, Lånekassa, needed a couple of months as well, to get the application processed.

So I didn't recieve the founding, untill January, four months late.

And then I had lost control, on the several differnt loans I had in Norway, and my Norwegian mobile bill.

Since I wasn't that good at understaning the dog-and-bone, phone-card, system, that one had to learn, to take calls from the Forge flats landline phone.

I had presumed, that it wouldn't take that long time to get the Lånekassa founding.

And I had quite a lot of money with me there, since I had been working a lot, on Rimi Langhus, as a manager, in the summer of 2004.

So I got by, untill January 2005, for four months, on the money I earned in the summer, even if I spent quite a lot of money the first month in Sunderland.

Since I had planned to stay in Britain, after ending the studies in Sunderland, in 2005.

Due to the mentioned problems in Oslo.

So I also built myself a desktop-computer there, and bought a lot of clothes etc., since I had planned to stay in Britain, so I didn't have to worry about excess bagage.

But, I lost control, on my bills in Norway, since the study-founding, was delayed by four months.

And I also lost control, of the studies, since I had some problems, finding the right modules.

For some of the modules, one had to be very good at writing in English.

So, that it was challinging for native Brits, to complete the module.

So when I understood that a couple of the modules I had chosen, weren't that smart for Norwegian speakers, to chose, then I changed a bit on the modules.

And I also, had to get the modules, in line with the HiO-modules, since I had to do this, to get the modules approved, by HiO, to get the study-finance from Lånekassa.

And before I went to Sunderland, I didn't really want more people than necessary, eg. the lecturers at HiO etc., to know where I was going, due to the earlier mentioned problems in Oslo/Rimi Bjørndal.

So I waited untill I got there, to start working with finding out of the modules.

So, when I finally recieved the study-founding, in January 2005, then I was so long behind scedule, for the modules, so I decided, that it would be smarter, to just try to find a job.

The first day in Sunderland, I overheard the study abroad manager there, commenting to a collegue, that he didn't understand why I wanted to study, with the papers I had from before, from NHI and HiO, he said that he didn't think I needed to study any more, to get a job, to a collegue there, the first day there, so that I overheard it, from where I was sitting there.

I had heard that the job-market was difficult in Sunderland.

And I though noone would know who I was in London, so I went there.

And then I had plan to find a job, and an appartment, and to contact the University again, when I was established there, and had a flat and a job, and internet and/or a landline etc., since it took some time for me to get a British mobile etc, in London.

But things didn't go according to plan, unfortunalty.

And the University of Sunderland, where very fine, since they didn't throw me out, from the Forge, even if my study finance was delayed for many months.

But I was in a difficult situation.

I didn't want to find myself, without any money, without a degree, without a job, in the summer of 2005.

So thats why I thought it would be smarter, to go London, in February 2005.

While I still had the study-finance.

So then I could try to get a job there, and then sort with the money I owed the University and the banks in Norway, and get payment-plans for the money I owed.

I thought this would be a better solution, than wait till the summer of 2005, with trying to get a job, due that I was very behind schedule already, with the modules, and since I was a study abroad student, with the lectures being held in English, then I thought the chances of me finishing the degree on shedule where low.

And if I hadn't managed this, then Lånekassa wouldn't have given me any more study-finance for 2005/2006, since I was already, close to a year delayed, with the modules from NHI and HiO, due to working quite a lot as a manager etc., besides the studies.

And the Lånekassa-limit, for when the study-finance is being stoped, is if one are more that one year delayed, which I would have been if I hadn't finished all the modules, which didn't seem likely at all that I would have managed, since I was really delayed with the modules by January 2005.

So thats why I chose to go to London.

But now, when I think back, I think it was a bit strange, that HiO should make so much problems for my studies at Sunderland.

But I had some problems with my face also. (It's a long story), so this distracted me a bit, I must admit, since my face didn't look very normal at all there.

I think I was subject of some kind of plot, so that the skin in my face, was very strange, and thin, and to thight, so I didn't look like usually had done, so this I thought was a bit embarrasing and strange.

So this was also one of the reasons, that I wanted to go to London, since I had been having problems with my face looking strange, when I was in Sunderland.

So I used to work-out, and swim, a lot, on the Sports Center there, this helped me relax, and forget about the problems.

So I was really more at the Sports Center almost, than at the University.

But really, the most important thing for me, surrounding this study-year, was to get away from Oslo.

Because it wasn't very fun living in Oslo, the last months there.

Because every time I went out the door, I overheard people talking about me, behind my back.

I overheard things like:

'Haven't they taken him/got him yet, haha'.

'I can't see why it should be so difficult to get him, since he's walking the same way home from work each day'.

'He's even buying clothes this guy'. (Said in a more or less chocked way, when I bought a couple of t-shirts, on H&M, at Stortorget, in Oslo, around March 2004.

And also at HiO, there were people talking, more or less, behind my back, saying things more or less similar, to this.

I had already overheard, in December 2003, when I was working on Rimi Bjørndal, that I was followed by the 'mafia' _also_.

And I heard some collegues talking, about another collegue there, Songül, a Kurdish girl from Turkey, being together with a mafia-guy, and that she was calling to the store, and to all the people she knew, trying to get information about me, and trying to get to the stores employment-folder, to see if there was any information about me there.

Which I heard the collegue, say to Songül, that she couldn't get to the employee-folder, since it was looked in, in the safe.

But, anyway, I thought it was a bit strange, always hearing people talk, in a upset/shocked way, behind my back, so it was very nice, to get to Britain and Sunderland, where people were behaving a bit more normal, than I thought people were behaving in Oslo.

I don't think I could have coped with living much longer in Oslo, since it was like everybody knew what was going on.

Expect me, maybe, since I had never read anything about, in the paper, that one could end op, being followed by some mafia, in Norway.

So this was a surprice to me.

And people were acting very strange when I went out the door, and I got strange phone-calls from friends etc.

But I didn't have much money, when this happened, in December 2003, I was a student then.

So I just had to try to be calm, and get through it, untill the automn, when I had planned, to go abroad, on the study aboad programme.

Since I didn't think the situation in Oslo was very fun, seemingly being followed by some mafia, and the whole town seemingly knowing about what went on, but without the possibility, of finding out more, about this, by reading in the paper, or on the internet, since things like these, weren't written about.

So this was a surprice to me, who thought, that what when on in society, should be written about in the paper.

So I decided, to wait with calling the Police, since obviously had failed, in informing the public, regarding what was going on.

And then, when I had my own flat, abroad, then I wanted to find who it was in the Police, who were the experts on this subject, mafia etc. (Kripos, I read it was, who were the experts on organised crime/mafia problems etc, I read in the online Norwegian newpapers, when I was studying in Sunderland).

But they havent even given me advice, now that I have been calling them, in 2005, 2006 and 2007.

So it's obvious that something serious is wrong, in society.

Something that a lot of people know about.

I think the media and the Police, probably also must know about the problems that are going on.

But for some reason, they don't inform the public, about what's going on.

So it's difficult, to know who to trust, regarding issues like this.

I think people have the right to get advice from the Police etc.

But I haven't managed to get any advice from the Government, even if I have contacted a lot of ministries etc., regarding this, both in Norway and Britain.

So it's obvious that something is going on.

And I'm not sure who's side the Governments are on, I must admit.

If they are on the mafias side, or what they are.

Or if they are on the normal peoples side.

I wouldn't be to certain about, that the Government are on the normal peoples side, when it comes to problems like this.

I think it's obvious, that there some serious things going on, in society, that the Government, and the media, for some reason, aren't informing the public about.

I'm not sure if maybe everybody are aware of this.

It seems to me, that very many people must be aware of whats going on, and must get some kind of underground information, regarding this.

But in case, that there are someone, that haven't heard anything about this, then I would maybe try to tell a bit, that it seems like the Government, and the media, are involved in some kind of agenda, to do with not people, what it is that's going on.

This seems quite clear to me.

At least clear enough, to me, so I think I should maybe mention this, since it seems, that it isn't only in Norway, that things like this, is going on.

So that's why I thought I could maybe mention this, while I was writing here anyway.

That I'm not sure how much trust I would have in the Government actually telling people whats going on.

Even if, I think, if I remember right, that one of the foundations for democracy, is, that people know whats going on in society.

So if the Government don't tell people whats going on, then it's not really a democracy, it's a Plutocracy, like I've read in the Norwegian papers, in the late 90s, and in the first years of this millenium, that the papers have been writing in some of the comments etc. in the paper.

That in Norway, the Governing-system, is really a plutocracy.

I didn't really understand exactly what they meant by this.

But now, I'm beginning to understand.

It means that everyone, that are not in the elite, have no rights.

You have to have a university degree, etc., to get help from the Police, if something happens.

Or to get help from the legal-system etc.

Like I read in a Norwegian blogg/online newspaper, Riksavisen, lately.

In the justice-system, one, as a normal person, aren't finding justice, you are meeting/opposing the power.

So the justice-system, is political.

It should be about peoples rights, but it isn't.

It's about the Government, who is organised like some kind of mafia, so that you won't get any help from any Government organisations.

On the conterary, they can start putting obstacles in your way, and start messing you around, like HiO did, when I wanted to study abroad.

Like this, the justice system can be, the different ombudsmen, the different ministries, the prime ministers office in Norway, the list goes on and on.

It isn't only me, who is writing about this, or have experienced things like this.

This is also mentioned, on the Riksavisen site, where they use an example from the municipality Eiker, in the County of Buskerud, in Norway, where the local Government, crushed, picturally, a citizen, by working together, like a mafia, to achieve this purpose.

And I've also read about this other places, even if there is very much information on the net, regarding Illuminati/New World Order, so it's a bit difficult to remember exactly where I've been reading all the different things.

But it's really to search on Google about these terms, and I must admit, that even if I hadn't heard about the term Illuminati, or reflected anything on the term 'New World Order', six months or a year ago.

Even so, I must admit, that if I add what I've experienced myself, together with a lot of the information one cand find, if search on this issues on the internet, then it seems to me, more and more, that the probelms with these agendas, are very real, even if they aren't properly explained about in the newspapers.

Also, there seems to be different mafias, in addition to this.

I've read, that the muslims, aren't in on the New World Order agenda.

But, I've also read, that the reason, for why, countries like Norway, and cities like Oslo, have let in so many muslims imigrants, is to help holding the natives in check, or traumatise them even, so that the Illuminati/New World Order/The New Elite, wont lose control, on the normal people, on the sheep og the goy, like they are calling them.

These are anyone, who aren't in the top percentage of the elite, that know whats going on, and want to control the rest of the people.

The ones, that they don't think deserves to be alive, or the ones who seem to difficult to tame maybe, are being put in the 'slaughterhouse'.

This means, that the Illuminati/New World Order, exploites them, in every way they can, to use them as slaves, to work in shops, etc, used as spies by the police, againts ones will, etc.

Everything and everyway they can think of, of exploting this person, till they die.

They don't think about them as people, but as sheep or cattle, that they can do whatever they want with.

And they have a Government administration/mafia, and an Illuminati mafia, (these two are probaly just the Illuminati I guess), who help them, so that the vitims, that are in the slaughterhouse, wont get any help, from their familiy, friends, workplace, government and human rights organisations, since all of these people and institutions, have been taken control of, in the slaughterhouse-plan, that the Illuminati, has laid up, for this person/cattle.

I'm not sure where they make these plans, but I wouldn't be very surprised if it was in the Pentagon, and in the Free-mason buildings.

And they are very good at making plans, and cover ups.

When it seems, that the Illuminati, have been taken down, and lost control.

And then they manage to cover this up anyway.

Then this is called a false dawn, or another false down.

Which there have been many of, during the last centuries, since the Illuminati, are from the end of dark ages, or even longer back.

And it also seem to me, that there is a war, of some kind, against light-haired people.

Eigther as part of, or in adition to, this mentioned Illumintai/New World Order agenda, in which the richest people in the world, the new elite, wants to control the world, and exploit the people they find worthless, that they call excess baggage, for the human race.

They just exploit these people mercylessly, in a type of Matrix-system, or like the Ace Ventura-guy movie, about the guy who finds out that he is on TV all the time, or what it was. The Truman show? Something like this.

This is my impression, about what it is that's going on now.

One could see this, when Hurricane Katrina was destroying New Orleans.

Now help, was given, to the poor people, who didn't have cars, and could get away from the city, on their own.

The facist leaders there, which I think one have to call them, with George W. Bush, and Co., did not put in, by far, enough resources, to help the poor people that was left in New Orleans, during Hurricane Katrina.

Why didn't the let the US Army or US navy help these people?

I can't see this any differently, than that it was an example of facist New World Order policy.

That people were just considered sheep, cattle or excess baggage, by the elite/people in power, and left to their own destiny, and given little or noe help.

The same, with the Tsunami, in Asia, in 2004, where the Asian countries, where not called, and warned, by the US tsunami monitoring center, for the Pacific, who sat and watched the tsunami, getting closer and closer to Asia, on their computer screens, for hours, without they, or their managers, calling the Asian countries embassies etc., to try to warn them, which they should have had plenty of time to do.

The use the excuse, that they didn't have their Asian collegues phone-numbers.

But, you it should only be to get your manager, to escalate, and get someone to inform these countries embassies.

It isn't difficult, for someone, to find the phone-number, to eg. the Thai embassy.

It's just to call 118 118, or what it is again.

And the embassys, would know who in eg. Thailand to call.

I shouldn't have been more difficult than that.

In stead, hunded of thousands of people were killed by the tsunami, since no warning was given.

So I suspect that these failures to give help to people, in these natural catastropies, are so un-explainable, that I think must have been to do with some type of New World Order aganda.

At least this is how it seems to me.

There are probably a lot of people, who'll say, that this just nonsense etc., it can't be like this, the people in power aren't as cynical as this.

Then I'll just recomend, to try to do the same as I myself did, last week, to search on eg. 'Illuminati' or 'New World Order', on Google.

Then it's possilbe to find, I think, millions of web-pages, with information about this.

And they all add together, it seems to me.

It's just that the normal media, are all part of a New World Order agenda.

So they don't want people to know this.

That's why it isn't in the news.

So if people don't want to end up in the 'slaugterhouse', being mercylessly exploited, by the Government/elite/Illuminati, in different types of slavery, untill one dies, without getting any form of help, from family, friends, the Government, Human Rights Organisations etc, since all of these, have been already been instructed by the Police and others, not to help.

If the risk of ending ones life in slavery, and being exploited by the super-rich New World Order elite (Bush, Blair possibly, Brown possibly, prince William, the Queen of England, the Rotchilds, the Rockefellers, the Bilderberger-group people. Microsoft is involved, I've read. The ones that have/is participating in the pervert club, that the American elite, with Bush and Co., has, called Bohemian Groove, where smuff-film type of pervert stuff, with very pervert explotaition of people is going. And who has an owl, as their logo. Bush and Prince William, have both been taken pictures of, showing the owl/devil sign, with showing your index-finger, and the smallest finger, what it's called again. This is because they are memebers of this pervert club, where they have slaves, who they exploit and torture, and execute etc. I'll find a link):

Here's what President Bush, and Prince William & Co., seems to be up to, since they are showing this sign, of the owl, or the devil, which is the logo of the very pervert Bohemian Grove club, that the elite have.

I can't see any other reason, why they would show this sign, than they must almost without any doubt, be members of this very pervert Bohemian Groove club, that one can read here, about some of the very pervert things they are doing, and thing I've read on other web-sites about this club, was even worse:

http://www.savethemales.ca/000683.html

If someone reading this post don't belive me, then it should really just to Google 'Bohemian Groove', and then it should be so many web-pages regarding this, which also are quite well-documented, many of them, so it shouldn't really be much doubt that it is like this.

So if people don't want to end up as being exploted, and in the end killed, in a very pervert way, or used as slaves or killed or exploited, in other ways, by the New World Order elite, then I'm not sure what they should do, other than try to keep this in the back of their heads, and try to be aware of this, and try to use ones head.

And if one don't belive me, that it really is like this, then it should really be just to search on 'Illuminati', 'New World Order' or 'Bohemian Groove', on the net, and then, after reading some of the millions of web-pages, that has been written about these subject, then I don't think it should be very much doubts, that this is really how it is.

Now I wrote a bit away from the subject, but I wold suspect that the 'magic' automated replies, in the CAB head office, are in some way also linked to this New World Order/Plutocracy/Slaugherhouse agenda.

It would suprice me more if it wasn't.

I think I should be able to ducument the things I've been writing in this blog-post, so pleace just contact me, by writing a comment to this post, or eg. by sending an e-mail to my e-mail address, which should be possible to find, on my profile here on Blogger.

Then I can try to explain better, about things that I might have forgotten to explain well enough about, regarding this, in this blog-post.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

Lånekassa, er det for strenge regler? (In Norwegian).

Nå har jeg diskutert litt på en Facebook-side, hvor det handler om å prøve å løse mordet på hun norske dama som ble drept i London.

I forbindelse med det, så har det vært omtalt, at hun måtte avbryte studiene sine i Polen, og dra tilbake til Norge.

Så er spørsmålet.

Hvis man avbryter et studie, får man da studielån, for et nytt studie?

Jeg vet i hvertfall, at det er sånn, at hvis man er så og så mange studiepoeng forsinket, tilsvarende et år, så får man ikke mer støtte.

Så er spørsmålet.

Er Lånekassa for strenge?

Jeg vet at det er mange som sliter med at de må jobbe mye ved siden av studiene.

Hvis man bor i Oslo, så er det jo press på en, om at man skal være så og så vellykket, og ha så og så dyre klær osv.

Man kan vel ikke forlange, at folk skal være fornøyd med å gå rundt i klær som bestemor har strikka til julegave, hvis alle de andre på skolen har de nyeste design-klærna.

Det er jo sånn, at rikdom og fattigdom, er relativt.

At hvis man bor i Oslo, og skal finne ut om noen er fattige, så må man sammenligne de med andre i Oslo, og ikke med folk i andre verdensdeler f.eks.

Man må vel sammenligne med folk i samme miljø.

Og det går vel på selvtilliten til folk og.

Hvis de blir sett ned på, fordi de ikke har de siste designklærna.

Så, man må vel regne med, at noen, vil jobbe mye, ved siden av studiene, for å betale høy husleie, dyrt månedskort, høye utgifter til klær og sosiale aktiviterer, for å være like vellykkede som resten av folka.

Så da må man vel regne med, at noe av jobbingen, går ut over studiene.

Og hva med folk som f.eks. drar til Polen, for å studere medisin?

De kan man vel ikke forvente, at skal klare studiene like bra, som folk som studerer i Norge, med forelesninger på norsk.

Så er det for strengt, fra Lånekassa, når de kun tillater, et års forsinkelse, i forbindelse med studier, før støtten forsvinner.

Ødelegger de ikke mange unge liv da?

Jeg mener, i Norge, så har jo vi noe som kalles velferdssamfunn.

Det vil si, at staten tar vare på folk, fra de fødes til de dør.

Så familier, er jo ikke så sammensveiset, som de var i gamle dager.

Før industrialiseringen f.eks., når mange bodde på landet, og familien, bodde gjerne i en generasjonsbolig da.

Systemet, i Norge, er jo sånn, at det er lagt opp, rundt enkeltpersoner.

Så da er jo folk vant til det.

Og de gir kanskje ikke så mye støtte, til familiemedlemmer og venner.

Siden alle er vant til, at staten ordner opp.

Nå er jo Norge et rikt land da.

De fleste har kanskje nok penger.

Men hva hvis man kikker rundt Oslo S osv., og ser alle de narkomane, som har mista kontrollen, og som ingen prøver å hjelpe, ser det ut som.

Det virker ikke som om staten, er så flink til å ta vare på folk egentlig.

Og de som står der, med ufullførte studier, og studiegjeld.

Hva med de da?

De har jo ingen yrkeserfaring, eller yrkesutdannelse.

De må vel begynne å jobbe i ufaglærte jobber de da.

Det er kanskje ikke noe galt i det.

Men de har jo en del hundretusen i gjeld da.

Så da er de kanskje enkle ofre for kriminelle miljøer osv., siden de har økonomiske problemer, og dårlige fremtidsutsikter.

Jeg tror sånne kriminelle miljøer, venter til man er i en vanskelig situasjon, og så slår de til, med 'an offer you can't refuse', osv.

Jeg husker en kamerat av meg, tremenningen min, Øystein Andersen, som dreiv automatfirma, uti Lørenskog der osv.

Han visste jeg hadde dårlig råd, da jeg studerte på NHI, var det vel.

Hvis det ikke var, da jeg var arbeidsledig, en måned eller to, etter militæret.

Og da fikk jeg tilbud, om at navnet mitt, kunne stå som ansvarlig, for noen ulovlige pokermaskiner.

Så skulle jeg få penger for det da.

Og sånne luretilbud, det tror jeg sånne luringer, venter med å komme med, til de har fått høre, fra felles bekjente f.eks., at nå har Erik dårlig råd.

Og sånn, kan jeg forestille meg, forekommer nok enda oftere for jenter.

Man kan jo tenke seg hvordan tilbud dem ville ha fått i samme situasjon.

Jeg husker jo hva grunnen var, til at lånekassa sa, at nå innførte de en grense på et års forsinkelse.

De ville ikke ha så mange 'evige' studenter.

Nei det er greit det Lånekassa.

Men det er vel forskjell på å barbere seg, og å kappe av seg hue, som dem sier.

Hvis dem hadde økt det til 3 eller 5 år da.

Da ville dem ikke fått noe evige studenter.

Og dem ville jo fått penga tilbake uansett.

Folk ville jo da fått graden sin, og en karriære, og en bedre betalt jobb.

Og det er greit at det finnes noen som ville ha utnyttet systemet.

Men det er vel ikke noen unnskyldning det, for å ødelegge unge menneskers liv.

Da får man heller akseptere, at det er noen luringer, som går å daffer et år eller to.

Dem må jo betale tilbake lånet uansett.

Nå sier kanskje noen, at i USA, så får dem ikke studielån i det hele tatt.

Det er greit det, men der er samfunnet sånn, at ingen får noe penger av staten.

Og da er det vel mer kultur, for veldedighet osv.

I Norge, så tenker vel folk, at de narkomane osv., de får klare seg selv.

Så hvis folk faller utenfor, så står de vel der alene, og alle bare ser ned på dem.

For det er sånn det er i Norge, siden alle er så vant til, at staten tar vare på folk, så vanlige folk, behøver ikke å tenke på andre folk, for det er staten sitt ansvar.

Så derfor, synes jeg, at staten egentlig, når vi først skal ha velferdssamfunn.

Da kan de ikke bare plutselig kutte ut studiestøtten, midt i utdanningen til folk, fordi folk er noen måneder forsinket med studiene.

Det kan være mange forskjellige grunner til det.

Så når vi har bestemt, at vi skal ha et velferdssamfunn, da synes jeg ikke staten bare kan trekke seg fra det, og ødelegge folks liv, sånn midt i studiene, jeg skjønner ikke at det kan være lønnsomt, hverken for enkeltpersonene, eller for landet heller.

Det må da være bedre, hvis folk får fullført utdannelsen sin, og kommer seg videre i livet, enn at dem skal slite i en minstelønnsjobb, med masse studielån osv., og aldri komme seg noe fremover.

Det må da være bedre for samfunnet, hvis den grensen var f.eks. tre år eller fem år, mener jeg da.

Staten ville jo fått tilbake pengene sine uansett, og vi ville fått færre unge folk, som mista kontrollen på livene sine, midt i en sårbar periode, før de var etablerte osv.

Det er mulig at det er bare jeg som tenker sånn.

Men jeg kom på det nå, så da tenkte jeg, at jeg fikk vel skrive om det, før jeg glemte det.

Så får jeg se om jeg får gjort noe annet her og.

Vi får se.