johncons on Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:40 am
traffic_cone wrote:
johncons wrote:
The e-mail address, that I was given, in a meeting, was:
civil.litigation.e@merseyside.police.uk
http://www.scribd.com/doc/4848292/encl- ... laddresses
Where as the address, that is written on their letters, is:
civil.litigation.e.@merseyside.police.uk (An extra dot, after the 'e').
http://www.scribd.com/doc/4848297/encl- ... laddresses
I asked the Police about this, and then they said, that the first e-mail address, was the correct one.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/4848223/email ... resses-etc (This is where I explained to the IPCC about this,
but the actual e-mail from the Police, is one of the e-mails in this link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/4847797/walton-police-email ).
So the Merseyside Police, (the Standards Unit), have printed their e-mail address wrongly, on their offical letters.
I work as a Company Researcher, and I'm used with evaluating companies.
If a company, have two official general enquiery e-mail addresses, then I'd say that something isn't right.
And I wouldn't have trusted the company, and I wouldn't have added them on the directory, that I'm working on.
The same with the Police Standards Unit, if they have two official general enquiery e-mail addresses for the unit, and claim both to be
their official e-mail address, then I find this so unprofessional, so that I don't trust the Police-force any longer, like I reported to the IPCC.
You don't think it might be a misprint?
Especially as "civil.litigation.e.@merseyside.police.uk" wouldn't be a valid syntax for an e-mail address?
No,
I don't think it's a misprint, because I don't think the Police should use letters, with misprinted e-mail addresses on them.
Then they should have thrown them away, and printed new letters.
I've recieved at least two letters with the e-mail address written like that, on them.
The people working there, are detectives etc.
If the Police-detectives, can't detect errors like that, then I don't trust the detectives.
And I don't think that it's not a valid e-mail address syntax, since I've been sending e-mails, and got confirmed that they
have been recieved, to an e-mail address with the same syntax.
http://www.ush.net/board/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=229585&sid=9b66c5b313df46405aed9ea42e30b221
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Erik Ribsskog
- Overhørte på Rimi Bjørndal, (jeg jobbet som butikksjef/leder i ti år, i mange forskjellige butikker), i 2003, at jeg var forfulgt av 'mafian', mm. Har etter dette ikke fått rettighetene mine, i mange saker. Blogger derfor om problemer med å få rettigheter, mm. Mine memoarer, (Min Bok 1-10), kan også finnes på johncons-blogg, (se: 'Etiketter'). Jeg blogger også om slektsforskning, (etter at min danskfødte mormor, som var etter adelige/kongelige, døde i 2009). Har også vært såvidt innom Høyre/Unge Høyre, i sin tid. Har også studert informasjonsbehandling/IT/Computing, (på NHI, HiO IU og University of Sunderland). Har også bakgrunn fra handel og kontor, (grunnkurs, økonomi med markedsføring og data). Er/var også i Heimevernet, (etter at jeg ble overført dit, etter førstegangstjeneste i infanteriet, (og en rep-øvelse i mob-hæren), i forbindelse med omorganiseringer, i Forsvaret, etter den kalde krigen). Blir også utsatt for mye nettmobbing, mm. johncons-blogg, (og mine memoarer og nettbutikk), er kjent fra TV-programmet Tweet4Tweet, i 2012, (selv om jeg måtte klage, for programmet var veldig useriøst/nedlatende, mm.).
No comments:
Post a Comment