Tuesday 30 September 2008

Noen i Bergen tror at det er en sammenheng mellom Siv Jensen og Illuminati. (In Norwegian).



http://www.google.no/search?q=siv%20jensen%20%2Billuminati&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:nb-NO:official&client=firefox-a

E-mail to the Home Office. (Reminder).







Google Mail - To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153





















Google Mail





Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>








To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153




















Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>







Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:30 PM









To:

public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk













Hi,





I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm


trying to send it again.





Yours sincerely,





Erik Ribsskog








---------- Forwarded message ----------


From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Date: Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:42 AM


Subject: Fwd: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153


To: public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk








Hi,





I've been having some problems with the IPCC, that they don't want to


investigate some problems,


regarding a complaint against the Merseyside Police.





They have freed the Police, even if it's clear that the Police have


done a lot of things wrong, they


have been operating with phoney e-mail addresses, and they have been


calling me 'Miss Erik


Ribsskog', and they have been lieing, and sending me to the CAB,


saying they are Government,


when they are a charity, and much more.





I also sent an update, with a new complaint, and I thought the


complaints should be investigated


collected.


But the IPCC didn't want to do this.


I think the whole process there is a mess now.





My last two e-mails to them, haven't been answered at all.





I think this is unaceptable by an institution like the IPCC, that have


an important function


in society.





At first, I thought that these problems I've been having, with the


IPCC and the Police, could be due


to, that I am a Norwegian citizen.





But I've now contacted EFTA, who explained to me, that since I am an


EEA-citizen, then I have the


same rights in Britain, as a UK citizen.





So I don't think I should be bullied by the Police like this, or


'messed with', by the IPPC, like this then.


I've thought that it was the Ministry of Justice, that IPCC sorted


under, in Britain, since it's like this Norway, that


Spesialenheten, the Norwegian equivalent of the IPCC, are sorting


under the Ministry of Justice there.





So I've been having a rather leangthy correspondence, with the


Ministry of Justice, regaring the problems with


the IPCC.





But today, I recieved an e-mail from the Ministry of Jusitice, that's


in this forward, where it was expained to me,


that the IPCC, is in fact, sorting under the Home Office.


So I'm sorry that I've been comunicating with the Ministry of Justice,


regarding the problems with the IPCC, when


I understand now, that I should have been contacting you.





Sorry about this!





I think you should maybe contact the IPCC, and look through the files,


for the compaints I've sent them, and the


correspondence, since I think there must be some problems there, since


they aren't answering my e-mails etc.





So I hope very much, that you have the chance to have a look at this!





Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog


PS.


Here are the e-mails, that IPCC didn't answer:





From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog


To: peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk Peter Crouch


Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:37:05 +0000


Subject: Fwd: Your Complaint To IPCC





Hi,





I can't see that I have recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, that's why


I'm sending it again.





Hope this is alright!





Yours sincerely,





Erik Ribsskog








---------- Forwarded message ----------


From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Date: Mar 4, 2008 11:29 AM


Subject: Re: Your Complaint To IPCC


To: Peter Crouch <peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>








Hi,





well like I had decided to wait on the Ipcc answer which you sent me last


week.





I didn't get a letter sent to me on 10/1, so I have not recieved


confirmation of dispensation, untill I read this e-mail now.





But now I'm aware of this, and I would please like to appeal to the Ipcc,


with the reason that I haven't got any confidense


in the force, due to the reasons already mentioned.





That they have a phoney general enquiery e-mail address and more.





And I also think the cases are linked.





I have sent the new case as an update to the old case, when I have been


contacting you.





So I think they should be investigated collected, by the Ipcc.





Hope this is alright!





Yours sincerely,





Erik Ribsskog








On 3/4/08, Peter Crouch <peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:


>


> Dear Mr Ribsskog,


>


> Thank you for your reply.


>


> I understand that you have lost of confidence in the Merseyside Police and


> have decided to await confirmation of dispensation. It appears from my


> records that a dispensation was granted by IPCC and a letter sent to you on


> 10th January 2008.


>


> With regard to any more recent complaints that we have forwarded to


> Merseyside Professional Standards department (PSD), the same situation may


> arise if you do not respond to any letters you have been sent. You may be


> better advised to cooperate with the PSD, despite your lack of confidence,


> allowing them to complete any enquiries they intend to make. At the end of


> this process you then may have a right of appeal to the IPCC. Ultimately the


> decision is yours, but I just wanted to make it clear that you may


> disadvantage yourself by not cooperating.


>


> yours sincerely


>


> *Peter Crouch*


> *Senior Casework Manager*


> *Telephone Complaints Centre*


> *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*


> 90 High Holborn


> London WC1V 6BH


> Direct Line: 020 7166 3123


> Personal Fax: 020 7166 3423


> E-mail: peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk


>


>


> ------------------------------


> *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]


> *Sent:* 28 February 2008 19:12


> *To:* Peter Crouch


> *Subject:* Re: Your Complaint To IPCC


>


>


> Hi,


>


> thank you very much for your answer!


>


> Like I exlained earlier, I've lost a bit of confidence in the Merseyside


> Police, due


> to the phoney e-mail addresses etc., so I don't think theres any point in


> me


> going to any more meetings with them etc.


>


> I'll just wait untill they're finished, and then I'll appeal to the Ipcc,


> for the Ipcc,


> to have a look at the incidents collected.


>


> Like I informed the Ipcc about in one of the former e-mail, which you are


> answering


> me on now, I recieved a letter from the Merseyside Police, from 3/12, last


> year,


> from an Inspector on the Complaints Investigation Bureau.


>


> It says in the letter, that they want an answer, within 21 days from 3/12.


>


> Then they were going to inform the Ipcc, that 'the need for further


> investigation


> of your complaint be discontinued because of lack of co-operation'.


>


> So I reackon I'll eighter hear from you, the Ipcc, or the Force then, once


> the Force


> have finished with their enquieries.


>


> And then I'll contact the Ipcc, when I've got confirmation from the Force


> or the Ipcc,


> that the investigation from the Force have been discontinued.


>


> Hope this is alright!


>


> Yours sincerely,


>


> Erik Ribsskog


>


>


>


>


> On 2/28/08, Peter Crouch <peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:


> >


> > Dear Mr Ribsskog,


> >


> > I am writing in reference to your e-mail of 3rd January 2008 marked for


> > the attention of Douglas Cleaver. As the line manager for Sarah Brown


> > and previously the line manager for Joanne Fitzgerald, he has asked me


> > to respond to the concerns that you raise.


> >


> > Firstly please accept my sincere apologies for the prolonged delay in


> > contacting you.


> >


> > The first issue that you raised concerned an e-mail that you sent to my


> > colleague Joanne Fitzgerald on 10th November 2007, in which you


> > expressed a lack of confidence in the Police, following a meeting with


> > Walton Lane Police Station on 8th November 2007. You were informed by Ms


> > Fitzgerald that she had forwarded the e-mail to Michael Gibbs, the IPCC


> > Casework Manager who had been dealing with an Appeal that you had


> > submitted. Your concern appears to be a lack of response from Mr Gibbs.


> > Having looked into the matter I can see that Ms Fitzgerald asked Mr


> > Gibbs to consider whether the e-mail you had sent was part of the


> > previous Appeal. She also stated that he should pass the e-mail back if


> > he believed it to be a new complaint, which he duly did.


> > For your information the IPCC allocates the work to its staff based on


> > the category of work and geographical location of the force who are the


> > subject of the complaint. Accordingly all new complaints are dealt with


> > by my team at our London office and all Appeals, Dispensations and


> > Discontinuances are dealt with by the IPCC regional office dealing with


> > the Police Force concerned. In your case our Sale office deal with all


> > such matters regarding Merseyside Police related Appeals, Dispensation


> > And Discontinuances.


> > Since the e-mail of the 10th November 2007 was considered a new


> > complaint it was passed back to my department where it was assigned to


> > Casework Manager Sarah Brown, Joanne Fitzgerald having since moved into


> > a different department. Ms Brown contacted you on the 7th December 2007


> > and informed you that she had taken over the matter from Ms Fitzgerald.


> > However, I can see that since Ms Fitzgerald had informed you that she


> > had passed the e-mail to Mr Gibbs, you might still have expected a reply


> > from him even though you had been contacted by Ms Brown. I apologise if


> > there was any confusion there.


> > Also in your e-mail of 3rd January I notice that you refer to advice


> > received from Ms Brown that you should contact the police regarding your


> > lack of confidence in them. You state that this doesn't make sense.


> > While I appreciate you may wish the IPCC to become involved at this


> > point, you must remember that each police force is responsible for


> > considering complaints made against that force and for recording your


> > complaint. If you are not happy with the police's decision on recording


> > your complaint, you have the right to appeal to us. Therefore, while I


> > acknowledge your frustration with the response, Ms Brown advice to you


> > was appropriate.


> >


> > You also raised 3 concerns following a new e-mail sent to Ms Fitzgerald


> > on 5th December 2007.


> > 1) How to deal with a letter from the police.


> > 2) How to deal with a letter from the IPCC, in connection with an


> > harassment episode on Walton Lane Police Station on 8/11.


> > 3) The problem with Mr. Gibbs not answering the e-mail sent on 10th


> > November 2007.


> >


> > You go on to say that you consider only the 2nd point to have been


> > answered by Sarah Brown. However I can see that Ms Brown contacted you


> > by e-mail on 11th December 2007 and stated that whilst the police are


> > conducting an investigation into your complaint the IPCC is unable to


> > intervene and is not able to dictate which department carries out this


> > investigation. She went on to say that you will need to speak to the


> > Professional Standards Department (PSD) of Merseyside Police to discuss


> > further. While I appreciate that this does not make specific reference


> > to the letter received from the police, dated 3rd December 2007, it is


> > quite clear that we were not able to intervene and that you should


> > contact the PSD. As for the 3rd point concerning Mr Gibbs not


> > responding, I assume that Mr Gibbs did not feel it was necessary to


> > contact you since Ms Brown was now dealing with the e-mail from you. Ms


> > Brown similarly did not make reference to Mr Gibbs since she had


> > informed you that she would be responding to the e-mail that you had


> > sent Miss Fitzgerald.


> >


> > The final point you make in your e-mail, dated 3rd January 2008, was,


> > broadly, that the latest complaint should perhaps be dealt with together


> > with the previously made complaints. As you will be aware, the Appeal


> > that you submitted to IPCC in August 2007 had already been upheld and


> > the Merseyside Force instructed to 'record' your complaint. Therefore


> > they were already looking into that matter and the IPCC would not have


> > been able to instruct them to add any new matters to the existing


> > complaint. However, it is entirely possible that they might have chosen


> > to add them together once the new complaint was submitted. Once the


> > Force had completed their enquiries into any of the complaints that you


> > raised, you would have had a right to Appeal to the IPCC.


> >


> > I hope that this e-mail addresses the concerns that you have raised and


> > helps to explain the process that the IPCC has to follow and the reasons


> > behind some of the decisions that we took.


> >


> > yours sincerely


> >


> >


> > Peter Crouch


> > Senior Casework Manager


> > Telephone Complaints Centre


> > Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)


> > 90 High Holborn


> > London WC1V 6BH


> > Direct Line: 020 7166 3123


> > Personal Fax: 020 7166 3423


> > E-mail: peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk


> >


> >


> >


> >


> >


> >


> >


> >


> > ******************************************************************************


> > The information in this email is confidential and may be legally


> > privileged.


> > It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended


> > recipient


> > please notify the sender and delete this email; any disclosure, copying


> > or


> > distribution of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. The


> > content of


> > this email represents the views of the individual and not necessarily


> > those


> > of IPCC. IPCC reserves the right to monitor the content of all emails in


> > accordance with lawful business practice.This e-mail has been swept for


> > computer viruses but IPCC does not accept any liability in respect of


> > your


> > receipt of this email.


> >


> > Independent Police Complaints Commission


> > 90 High Holborn


> > London,


> > WC1V 6BH.


> >


> > ******************************************************************************


> >


> > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government


> > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in


> > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On


> > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.


> > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or


> > recorded for legal purposes.


> >


>


>


> This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government


> Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership


> with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of


> problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.


> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or


> recorded for legal purposes.


>


>


>


>


> ******************************************************************************


> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally


> privileged.


> It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended


> recipient


> please notify the sender and delete this email; any disclosure, copying or


>


> distribution of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. The content


> of


> this email represents the views of the individual and not necessarily


> those


> of IPCC. IPCC reserves the right to monitor the content of all emails in


> accordance with lawful business practice.This e-mail has been swept for


> computer viruses but IPCC does not accept any liability in respect of your


>


> receipt of this email.


>


> Independent Police Complaints Commission


> 90 High Holborn


> London,


> WC1V 6BH.


>


> ******************************************************************************


>


>


> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government


> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in


> partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On


> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.


> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or


> recorded for legal purposes.


>








---------- Forwarded message ----------


From: general.queries <general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk>


Date: Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:59 AM


Subject: RE: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153


To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>








Dear Sir,











Thank you for your email,











The Ministry of Justice are not responsible for the IPCC.





The IPCC falls under the responsibility of the Home Office, therefore


any further matters you wish to raise regarding the IPCC will need to


be directed to the Home Office.

















Many Thanks





________________________________





From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]


Sent: 18 September 2008 17:54


To: general.queries


Subject: Fwd: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153











Hi,











I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm


sending it again.











Yours sincerely,











Erik Ribsskog





---------- Forwarded message ----------


From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Date: Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:47 PM


Subject: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153


To: general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk





Hi,











I've tried to escalate a complaint, but it doesn't seem like your


representative is answering, to his





correspondence.











And I also thought that the original complaint, wasn't answered that


well, by another of your





representatives.





So it seems to me, that there are a lot of problems in the Ministry,


so I thought it would be





best, to send it to the top of the Ministry, so that you could have


the chance to have a look





at these problems, and to get these problems sorted, so that I maybe


could get a second





opinion, from the right person in your Ministry, to the original complaint.





Hope this is alright!











Yours sincerely,





Erik Ribsskog





---------- Forwarded message ----------


From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:42 PM


Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153


To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.uk





Hi,











I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm


sending it again.











Yours sincerely,











Erik Ribsskog





---------- Forwarded message ----------


From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>





Date: Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:31 AM


Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153


To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.uk





Hi,











I called the Ministry of Justice today, and I got your e-mail address,


from the clerk there.











The reason that I'm sending you this e-mail, is that I was wondering,


who it is, that one





should contact, if one are having problems with the IPCC.











Since they are not answering my e-mails, and I've already been in


contact, with the





complaints-manager there, so I think I've escalated it, as far as it's


possible to





escalate, at the IPCC.





So I was wondering, if it isn't the Ministry of Justice, that one


should contact, if the





IPCC, are having problems in the way, that they aren't answering e-mails etc.











Thanks in advance for any help regarding this!











Yours sincerely,





Erik Ribsskog





---------- Forwarded message ----------





From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Date: Jun 30, 2008 7:23 PM





Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153





To: "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>











Hi,











thank you very much for your answer!











I think that the IPCC, probably recieves founding from the Government.





And, I think, that if the IPCC, don't answer their e-mails etc, then


this is a matter, for the Ministry,





who are administratively in charge of the IPCC.











Which I think must be the Ministry of Justice.











I don't think the Ministry of Justice, can't pretend that they aren't


in charge of the Police, like





you are trying now.





So, I write this, mostly, to put it on my blog, and then I'll think


further, on how to go forward with this.





Yours sincerely,





Erik Ribsskog











On 6/30/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:





Dear Mr Ribsskog





Thank you for your email reply of 23 June.





While I am sorry to read of your ongoing concerns, I am afraid there


is little useful information I can add to the previous correspondence


that you have received from this Department.





As previously explained, if you choose to further your concerns


regarding your complaint with the Independent Police Complaints


Commission (IPCC), you must address the matter to the IPCC directly.


Similarly, the Ministry of Justice is unable to comment on or give


advice on how to escalate your case with the Federal Bureau of


Investigation (FBI) or the American Embassy. I can only confirm that


the points you have raised have been thoroughly considered and that


the Department has been as helpful as possible in answering your


concerns.





I am sorry that I am unable to be of more help, but I hope you can


appreciate for the reasons given above that the Department is unable


to intervene in your case. Hence, any further correspondence sent that


addresses the same points will be placed on file and not responded to.





Yours sincerely,





Ryan Holmes





Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division





-----Original Message-----


From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]


Sent: 23 June 2008 14:20


To: Holmes, Ryan


Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153





Hi,











I've already been in contact with the Complaints Manager at the IPCC,


but this hasn't resovled the problems.





I suspect could be some corruption involved there, because something


is obviouslly wrong there in my opinion.











Also I wondering a bit on how to escalate the case I've been in


contact with the FBI, or the American Embassy,





about.











Also, I've been in contact with the Norwegian equivalent, of the IPCC,


that's Spesialenheten, regarding another,





but linked, matter.











And they sort under the Norwegian Ministry of Justice.





So, I think that the IPCC are sorting under the British Ministy of Justice(?)











If not, who should they then be sorting under?











Sorry if I'm asking stupid questions.











Yours sincerely,





Erik Ribsskog











On 6/23/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:





Dear Mr Ribsskog





Thank you for your email reply of 19 June.





The Ministry of Justice is unable to submit a complaint on your behalf


to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). Additionally,


a complaint against the IPCC cannot be directed to the Ministry of


Justice for review as this does not fall within the remit of this


Department. If you wish to make a complaint against the IPCC you must


do this by addressing your concerns to the IPCC directly. The


information provided below outlines how to do this.





If you have a complaint or query about a casework decision, the IPCC


will do their best to clearly explain the reason for their decisions


and answer any concerns you have. Please note however that IPCC


casework decisions are final and they will not necessarily be able to


change the outcome. For further information or advice on your rights


you can contact a Citizens Advice Bureau, solicitor or your local MP.





If you have a complaint about a member of staff at the IPCC, in the


first instance you can contact the person concerned and the matter may


be resolved there and then. As mentioned in my previous email,


Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has


conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on


0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint


further. However, since you mention that Miss Brown has not contacted


you in the past, you may wish to raise any issues of concern through a


line manager, or write to the Internal Complaints Manager.


Alternatively, you can download a complaint form via the link





http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/index/contact-us/complaints_ipcc.htm and make


your complaint against the IPCC using the contact details below.





Internal Complaints Manager





Independent Police Complaints Commission





90 High Holborn





London





WC1V 6BH





Fax: 0207 404 0695





Email:





internal.complaints.unit@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk.





I do hope that this information is of some use to you.





Yours sincerely,





Ryan Holmes





Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division











-----Original Message-----


From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]





Sent: 19 June 2008 20:35


To: Holmes, Ryan


Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153





Hi,











thank you very much for your e-mail, and the advice!











I wanted to complain about the IPCC, since the whole case is a mess,


and they don't reply to my e-mails,





and they don't call me, you mention Brown, she has been supposed to


call me, regarding the problems





with the missing answers on the e-mails, but she haven't called.





I think that the IPCC must have some serious problems, with handeling


the complaints I sent them,





which I view as one case really.





So I was wondering, how I could submit this complaint, on the IPCC, to


the Ministry of Justice.





If you think that you could please submit this complaint for me.











Also, I've contacted the FBI, in the American Embassy, in London.











And I asked them, on how should go forward, regarding reporting a


crime in the US, that someone,





has set up a hate-blog against me there.











The FBI/The American Embassy Legal Advice, tells me to contact my


local police-station, about this.





But I've lost a bit of confidence, with the Merseyside Police, due to


the things mentioned in the





complaints, sent to the IPCC, and more.





And then I thought, that I could contact the IPCC about this then,


since I didn't think I could contact





the local Police about this.











But now there has been so much problems, with the IPCC, so that I've


lost a bit of confidence, in





the IPCC, as well.











So then I have to contact the Ministry of Justice about this, since I


don't think that eighter the





Merseyside Police or the IPCC, have showed themselves, to be worthy,


of much confidence,





unfortunatly.





So I'm mentioning this now.











Hope this is alright!





Yours sincerely,





Erik Ribsskog











On 6/19/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:





Dear Mr Ribsskog





Thank you for your email reply of 5 June. I am also in receipt of your


email dated 13 June.





As explained in my previous reply, the Law Society is the regulatory


body for solicitors in England and Wales and will keep a comprehensive


list of solicitors practising in your local area. Their website


promotes a searchable database to help you find a solicitor which


allows you to search by firm name, area of law and/or post code. To


alleviate your concerns about contacting the Law Society due to


previous personal experiences, I should point out that this list is a


resource to assist the public locate suitable legal representation and


promote solicitors across England and Wales. You can access the


facility via the following link:





http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/choosingandusing/findasolicitor.law.





Alternatively, you could also look through a local directory, such as


the Yellow Pages, which might help identify a suitable firm. As


suggested in my previous reply, you may wish to contact the Law


Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401 who can provide contact details


for your local Law Centre. Also, you may find it helpful to access the


Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers


of legal advice at





www.clsdirect.org.uk. These are all alternative options available to


you that do not involve the assistance of the Law Society.





With regard to the complaint you have submitted to the Independent


Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), I have contacted the IPCC to


investigate the status of your complaint. Senior lawyers at the IPCC


inform me that without your expressed consent, I am unable to obtain


any information that relates to your complaint. I was informed however


that Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff


that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be


contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of


your complaint further.





I do hope that this information is of some use to you.





Yours sincerely,





Ryan Holmes





Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division





-----Original Message-----


From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]


Sent: 05 June 2008 01:51


To: Holmes, Ryan


Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153





Hi,











thank you very much for your e-mail!











I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding


getting a list, like you say,





for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.





But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are


already involved in this,





I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I


have been contacting





you about.





So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I


think they gave a bit of wrong





information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so


they are really involved in this





from before.





So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law


Society again, since they





are involved from before.





Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name


of companies like this?





Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.





I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.





But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I


was wondering who I should





contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with


the complaint on the Police?











Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!





Thanks in advance for the reply!











Yours sincerely,





Erik Ribsskog











On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:





Dear Mr Ribsskog





Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request


further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against


the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO).  To assist you with your concerns,


I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that


acknowledge your specific financial concerns.





Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the


Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider


contacting your local Law Centre.  Contact details for your local Law


Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401,


or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find


it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for


information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk.


Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for


free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.





Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a


Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA).  This allows a solicitor to accept a


case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from


you only if the case is won.  It is worth pointing that the


solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect


the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the


'success fee').  However, should you lose your case, you may still be


liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness


fees and other disbursements.  There are insurance schemes that, for a


premium, provide cover for these items.  As part of the implementation


of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the


successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance


premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of


conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.





Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro


bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service).  You can


contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors


that may provide pro bono services.  The Law Society is the regulatory


body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at


the following address:





The Law Society





113 Chancery Lane





London





WC2A 1SX





Tel: 0870 606 2555.





Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at


www.solicitors-online.com.





I do hope that you find this information useful.





Yours sincerely





Ryan Holmes





Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division





This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of


the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying


is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please


destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.





Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message


could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in


mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this


message by e-mail.





This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be


monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail


monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be


read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not


broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.


The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government


Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in


partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.)


On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.


Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored


and/or recorded for legal purposes.











This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the


Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by


Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate


Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your


organisation's IT Helpdesk.


Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored


and/or recorded for legal purposes.





This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of


the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying


is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please


destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.





Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message


could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in


mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this


message by e-mail.





This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be


monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail


monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be


read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not


broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.


The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government


Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in


partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.)


On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.


Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored


and/or recorded for legal purposes.





This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the


Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by


Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate


Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your


organisation's IT Helpdesk.


Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored


and/or recorded for legal purposes.





This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of


the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying


is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please


destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.





Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message


could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in


mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this


message by e-mail.





This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be


monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail


monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be


read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not


broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.


The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government


Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in


partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.)


On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.


Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored


and/or recorded for legal purposes.





This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the


Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by


Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate


Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your


organisation's IT Helpdesk.


Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored


and/or recorded for legal purposes.





This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of


the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying


is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please


destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.





Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message


could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in


mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this


message by e-mail.





This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be


monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail


monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be


read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not


broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.


The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government


Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in


partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.)


On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.


Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored


and/or recorded for legal purposes.





























This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the


Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by


Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate


Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your


organisation's IT Helpdesk.


Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored


and/or recorded for legal purposes.





This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of


the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying


is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please


destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.





Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message


could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in


mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this


message by e-mail.





This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be


monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail


monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be


read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not


broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.


The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government


Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in


partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.)


On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.


Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored


and/or recorded for legal purposes.















Da jeg bodde på Bergeråsen, frem til 1989, så lagde jeg for det meste Pizza Grandiosa. (In Norwegian).



Men søstra mi, Pia, hun lærte meg å steike kjøttdeig og sånn, da jeg og hu og en kamerat av meg, som het Glenn Hesler, bodde på Ungbo bokollektiv, på Skansen Terrasse på Ellingsrudåsen i Oslo, fra 1993 til 95.

Så de siste 15 årene, så har jeg lagd en del vanlig mat, som biff og koteletter, og kyllingfilet og sånn da.

Og Pasta de Napoli, fra Toro, sammen med kjøttdeig. Det var også en favoritt jeg pleide å lage, når jeg hadde jobba mye på Rimi, eller hvis jeg hadde vært på rep. med militæret eller HV.

Og også Chilli con Carne, fra Uncle Bens, var det vel.

Så det har ikke vært sånn, de siste 15 årene, at jeg bare har lagd pizza grandiosa.

Da jeg bodde i Rimi-leilighetene, på St. Hanshaugen, så var det noen år som jeg kjøpte mye av maten, da jeg var butikksjef osv.

For det var så små hybelleiligheter.

Og det var bare to kokeplater, og ikke komfyr.

Jeg kjøpte ny komfyr da, og oppvaskmaskin.

Men det ble så dårlig plass på kjøkkenet der, så det ble mest til at jeg kjøpte mat.

Men her jeg bor nå, så er det ca. tre ganger så stor plass, som i leiligheten jeg hadde i Oslo.

Her er problemet at varmtvannet har vært borte, det siste halve året minst, enda jeg har sagt fra mange ganger.

Men jeg er litt forsinka med leia, siden jeg bruker så mye tid, på å prøve å få rettighetene mine, fra all verdens myndigheter.

Siden når en først har begynt å steile, og tulle med meg, så virker det som at dette er smittsomt, og jeg har hørt jeg er forfulgt av noe 'mafia', så jeg prøver, naturlig nok vel, å få kontroll, og finne ut mer av hva som foregår.

Men det har vist seg ganske tidkrevende og umulig.

Så jeg har kommet på etterskudd, med den vanlige jobben min.

Men jeg kjøper engangsglass osv., siden det ikke er så artig å vaske opp i bare kaldt vann hele tida.

Så får vi se hva som skjer, om det dukker opp noen rettigheter etterhvert.

Det virker som om myndighetene er ganske gjerrige på å gi folk rettighetene sine.

Så hvorfor de nekter folk det, det vet ikke jeg, men de har vel noe å skjule da antagelig.

Jeg kan ikke se det på noen annen måte.

Så sånn er det.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Det skulle vel egentlig vært ris til det her, men jeg er litt lat.

Jeg skjønner ikke helt vitsen med ris, når man har brødskiver uansett, men det er sikkert noe poeng.

At maten blir varm, eller noe.

Det er mulig.

Men men.

Det jeg lagde nå, var noe som heter 'lean mince', fra Skottland.

Eller fra Tesco da, men det var den pakka som så best ut, den kosta bare ti pence mer, hvis den fra Skottland, og den så ut som at hadde mindre fett i osv.

Jeg er litt vant til å kikke på maten som jeg kjøper osv., fra da jeg begynte å lage biff osv., for da leste jeg noen brosjyrer, som jeg fant på Ica Tveita osv., rundt 1994 kanskje.

Og da stod det at man kunne se på biffen hvor mør den var, ettersom hvor mørkt kjøttet var osv.

Så man burde ikke bare se på etiketten, men også på selve kjøttet osv.

Men det er vet sikkert folk fra før antagelig.

Men men.

Lean mince, betyr slank kjøttdeig, eller noe da.

Det er altså karbonadedeig.

Også kjøpte jeg noe sånn saus til å steke kjøttdeig, eller egentlig kylling i, på 99 pence butikken.

Da fikk man to sånne glass for 99 pence.

Dem har mange rare curry-sauser osv., som er lignende av Uncle Bens-sauser i Norge.

Bare at de har mange jeg ikke har hørt om før osv.

Den jeg kjøpte på 99 pence butikken, den heter Rogan Josh, fra noe som heter Maharani.

Det er vel noe indiske greier tror jeg, for det er noe elefant på glasset osv.

Det er nok egentlig til kylling.

Og det er mulig det passer bedre til kylling.

Ellers så var det jeg som lagde litt for mye mat.

Men sånn er det når man får lønning, da kjøper man halve butikken osv., så jeg måtte nesten lage den kjøttdeigen før den ble dårlig osv.

Det er ikke sånn at jeg blir like sulten av å sitte foran dataen, og jobbe som 'company researcher', i emballasjebransjen.

Ikke det at jeg har hørt sånne jobber i Norge, men det er vel en online katalog da, så finner jeg informasjon om firmaer osv., ved å ringe, eller se på websider osv.

Jeg søkte jobb på Tesco og Lidl og Bestway, eller hva det heter, og flere andre steder.

Men jeg fikk ikke jobb på Tesco f.eks., enda jeg har jobbet 15 år i butikk i Norge, hvorav 10 år som leder, og fire år som butikksjef.

Og heller ikke på Spar.

Men jeg skal ikke gjette hva det kom av.

Men jeg fikk den jobben jeg har enda nå da, som jeg fant på den engelske arbeidsformidlingens websted.

Så jeg regner med at det er en ordenlig jobb osv., når jeg fant den på arbeidsformidlingens websted, mener jeg.

Så jobber jeg som selvstendig næringsdrivende da, så jeg betaler skatten på etterskudd, som man kan da.

Siden jeg har så mye annet å drive med, siden jeg blir så mye tullet med av myndighetene.

Men det er ikke sånn, som da jeg jobbet som 'slave' omtrent på Rimi, at jeg spiser en stor kebab, og en stor frossenpizza, når jeg kommer hjem fra jobb.

For når jeg jobbet som butikksjef, da var det ofte løping og flying gjennom hele butikken, hele dagen.

Og ingen lunchpause, vanligvis, for hvis man satt seg ned, så var det bare 'retur', klage, selger, kunde vil bytte vare, 'hva koster denne varen', osv., osv.

Så da spiste jeg heller masse mat når jeg kom hjem.

Så sånn var det.

Men jeg får se om jeg klarer å få opp farta når det gjelder jobben her og, for jeg trenger å skjerpe meg litt.

Vi får se.

PS 2.

Jeg tok masse bilder, i byen i dag osv., så jeg fortsatte å ta bilder av leiligheten her, og til og med meg selv, når jeg var i farta her.

Så kan man se det, at jeg tuller ikke, når jeg skriver at den leiligheten her er tre ganger så stor, som den leiligheten jeg hadde i Oslo, og kanskje ti ganger så stor, som den hytta, eller skjulet, som jeg bodde i, da jeg jobbet som en slave, må man vel si, for onkelen min og dama hans, i Kvelde i Larvik, i 2005:




















Tesco Metro i Liverpool. (In Norwegian).













Mer fra spillegal.no-forumet. (In Norwegian).

Originally Posted by HaZ
Jeg er klar over at dette er SG, og at mange av dere synes det er festlig å sparke mennesker som allerede ligger nede. Det er kanskje moro her/nå, men jeg skal love dere at dere kommer til å se på saken fra en annen synsvinkel om dere selv befinner dere på psykiatrisk avdeling, som innlagt selv, eller for å besøke en nær slektning eller en kjæreste.

Derfor vil jeg oppfordre alle her inne å bare la være. Finn noe annet dere kan henge dere opp i, om dere kjeder dere så fælt.

Og til Johncons:
Som du sikkert har lagt merke til, vil du ikke møte noen forståelse her. Derfor foreslår jeg at du slutter å svare, og holder deg til å bare lese det som skrives her. Ellers ønsker jeg deg lykke til, og god bedring.

Hei,

nei jeg skjønner det, at man ikke får noe forståelse her.

Men det som er, er at det virker ikke som at det er noen som bryr seg, hvis myndighetene tuller med ens rettigheter.

Jeg skjønner at folk som ikke blir tulla med, ikke bryr seg.

Men folk har jo universalle rettigheter, som det heter.

Altså at man har rettigheter, som gjelder overalt og alltid.

Og alikevel, så sitter jeg her og lurer på hva som skjedde med rettighetene mine.

Så hva som har skjedd med disse universale rettighetene, det lurer jeg på.

Det har tydeligvis forsvunnet som dugg for solen, som det heter.

Så det er nok noe som har skjedd da.

For i gamle dager, så pleide folk å ha rettigheter, men nå for tida, så har ikke folk rettigheter.

I hvertfall ikke i praksis.

Men i teorien, i følge lover og regler osv., så har man jo rettigheter.

Så hele samfunnet er bare noe hykleriske greier, virker det som for meg.

Men jeg skjønner at det blir kjedelig å høre på at jeg skriver om det her hele tida, for folk som ikke trenger beskyttelse av sine rettigheter.

Så da får jeg heller prøve å skrive mer på bloggen enn her.

Det er sikkert like smart.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog


http://spillegal.no.s8.subsys.net/forum/showthread.php?p=419586&posted=1#post419586

E-post til Solvit. (In Norwegian).







Google Mail - Problemer med at mine rettigheter ikke blir respektert, av myndighetene, i Norge og Storbritannia.





















Google Mail





Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>








Problemer med at mine rettigheter ikke blir respektert, av myndighetene, i Norge og Storbritannia.




















Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>







Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:41 PM









To:

Solvit Norway <Solvit-norway@nhd.dep.no>













Hei,





mange takk for svar!





Nå er ikke jeg vant til å kontakte Solvit, angående slike


problemstillinger, så det er mulig jeg tok et litt feil perspektiv, på


problemen, og det litt for generellt.





Problemet, er at jeg blir tullet med av så mange, så det er vanskelig


å få med alt, på en oversiktelig måte, samtidig, fra et deltalj-


perspektiv.





Men jeg kan prøve et nytt forsøk.





Da prøver jeg å ta med om problemene med politiet i Storbritannia, og


IPCC (tilsvarende spesialenheten i Norge).





(Det er mye mer og, men jeg må jo begynne et sted, så får jeg heller


komme tilbake til de andre problemene, etterhvert, hvis det er i


orden).





1. Politiet i Storbritannia. (Merseyside-politiet).





Jeg har vært i kontakt med de, i forbindelse at jeg har overhørt at


jeg er forfulgt av noe 'mafia', i Norge, og i forbindelse med en


arbeidssak, som jeg har mot Arvato Services Ltd's Microsoft


Scandinavian Product Activation.





Og også i forbindelse med at jeg er bekymret for om kollegaer der, fra


de nordiske land, var/er under kontroll av noen krimnelle nettverk, i


byen.





Problemer:





Politiet her, ville ikke etterforske denne saken, uten å tulle med meg.





Det gjør ting som dette:





- De lyver og sier at CAB er 'government', når det er en veldedig organisasjon.





- De skriver brev til meg, hvor de kaller meg 'Miss Erik Ribsskog'.





- De opererer med to forskjellige e-postadresser. (De har to e-post


adresser, for generelle henvendelser, og sier at begge er riktige).


Så den ene må være feil.





- De nekter å svare på henvendelser, selv etter at jeg fikk det norske


konsulatet i Liverpool, til å kontakte dem, for å påminne dem, om at


de måtte ringe meg tilbake.





2. IPCC.





IPCC, svarer ikke på e-poster, enda jeg har ringt de angående dette.





Så jeg lurer på om disse problemene, kan være fordi jeg er en norsk


statsborger, og da blir behandlet litt slik at det ikke er så viktig


med folk som er fra et lite land som Norge, så de er det bare å tulle


med, fordi Norge er ikke noen stormakt, så statsborgere fra Norge, de


er det ikke så nøye med å respektere rettighetene til, ettersom Norge


er et lite land, så er det ikke noe risiko forbundet med å tulle med


norske statsborgere, i et stort land som Storbritannia.





Jeg lurer på om det kan være noe sånn, som Merseyside-politiet og IPCC tenker.





Det er som sagt også mange andre myndigheter jeg har problemer med, at


jeg blir tullet med, både her og i Norge.





Men jeg starter med disse to myndighetene da, så får dere så om


perspektivet på henvendelsen ble riktigere nå, for tullet med blir


jeg, det er bare å greie å forklare det riktig, for meg, som ikke er


vant til å drive med sånne her ting.





Så får jeg håpe at jeg klarte det!





Med vennlig hilsen





Erik Ribsskog








2008/9/30 Solvit Norway <Solvit-norway@nhd.dep.no>:


> Hei,


>


>


>


> SOLVIT Norge takker for henvendelsen.


>


>


>


> Solvit er et internettbasert EU/EØS-myndighetsnettverk som assisterer


> borgere og foretak i EU/EØS. SOLVIT kan benyttes av borgere eller foretak


> som opplever at deres rettigheter etter reglene om det indre marked ikke


> ivaretas i møte med myndigheter i andre EU/EØS-stater. SOLVIT er ikke et


> nettverk for informasjon eller juridisk rådgiving, og behandler ikke saker


> om problemer mellom bedrifter eller mellom forbrukere og bedrifter, og


> heller ikke klager på EU/EØS-institusjoner. SOLVIT Norge behandler heller


> ikke saker mellom norske borgere/foretak og norske myndigheter.


>


> SOLVIT behandler kun problemer som kommer av feil anvendelse av EU/EØS-rett


> av offentlige myndigheter innen EU/EØS-land. Dersom SOLVIT Norge skal kunne


> ta opp et problem du har i Storbritannia, må derfor følgende vilkår være


> oppfylt:


>


> -          Problemet må gjelde en rettighet etter reglene om det indre


> markedet. Dette omfatter for norske borgere og foretaks del EØS-avtalens


> bestemmelser om fri bevegelighet for varer, tjenester, arbeidskraft og


> kapital.


>


> -          Problemet må ha oppstått ved at britiske myndigheter ikke


> anvender reglene om det indre marked riktig. Det må angis konkret hvilken


> myndighet det er snakk om.


>


> -          Problemet må gjelde en konkret sak, typisk der det er søkt om et


> gode eller en tillatelse.


>


>


>


> Dokumentene du har sendt til SOLVIT Norge gir ikke informasjon om hvilke


> rettigheter etter EØS-avtalen britiske myndigheter ikke overholder, og angir


> ikke konkret hva saken gjelder. SOLVIT Norge har derfor ikke tilstrekkelig


> grunnlag for å avgjøre om din sak egner seg for behandling gjennom SOLVIT.


>


>


>


> Slik saken står kan SOLVIT dessverre ikke ta saken til behandling.


>


>


>


> Mvh,


>


> Jostein Røynesdal


>


> SOLVIT Norge


>


>


>


>


>


>


>


>


>


> Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]


> Sendt: 19. september 2008 05:15


> Til: Solvit Norway


> Emne: Fwd: Problemer med at mine rettigheter ikke blir respektert, av


> myndighetene, i Norge og Storbritannia.


>


>


>


> Hei,


>


>


>


> jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten ennå, så jeg


> prøver å sende den på nytt.


>


> Med vennlig hilsen


>


> Erik Ribsskog


>


> ---------- Forwarded message ----------


> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


> Date: 2008/9/10


> Subject: Problemer med at mine rettigheter ikke blir respektert, av


> myndighetene, i Norge og Storbritannia.


> To: solvit-norway@nhd.dep.no


>


> Hei,


>


>


>


> jeg kontaktet EFTA, for å forsikre meg, om at man har samme rettigheter, som


> norsk statsborger,


>


> som jobber i Storbritannia, etter at EØS-avtalen kom, som britiske


> statsborgere.


>


> Og EFTA, kunne bekrefte at det var riktig, at nordmenn hadde de samme


> rettighetene, som


>


> britiske statsborgere og EU-statsborgere, når man oppholdt seg, og jobber,


> som nordmann,


>


> i Storbritannia, og følger vilkårene, som er nevnt i EØS-avtalen.


>


>


>


> EFTA anbefalte meg, å kontake dere, i Solvit.


>


>


>


> Problemet er, at jeg blir 'tullet med' av mange myndigheter, i både Norge og


> Storbritannia.


>


>


>


> Jeg kontaktet EFTA, angående problemene med britiske myndigheter, først og


> fremst.


>


>


>


> Men jeg blir også 'tullet' mye med, av norske myndigheter.


>


> Så det kan kanskje også være et problem, at norske myndigheter, ikke forstår


> EØS-avtalen.


>


>


>


> Fordi, som jeg forstår det, så har man fortsatt rettigheter i Norge, siden


> man fortsatt er norsk


>


> statsborger, selv om man jobber noen år i Storbritannia, f.eks.


>


>


>


> Men det er mulig at dette også går andre veien, at norske myndigheter, tror


> det er fritt fram,


>


> for å tulle med en, siden man bor i utlandet.


>


> Nå er det så mange myndigheter som tuller med meg, så jeg må nesten ta dette


> ganske


>


> generellt.


>


>


>


> Jeg bruker så mye tid, på å stå opp mot, alle disse myndighetene, i Norge og


> Storbritannia,


>


> som tuller med meg, så jeg har nesten ikke tid til å gjøre jobben min.


>


> Jeg får ikke brukt så mye tid på jobben min, som jeg burde, så jeg er


> forsinket med alle regninger,


>


> og har knapt penger til å kjøpe basis matvarer.


>


> Så jeg sender ikke noe detaljert klage nå, for det har jeg rett og slett


> ikke tid til nå, fordi denne


>


> 'tullingen', fra norske og britiske myndigheter, er så omfattende.


>


>


>


> I går, så sendte jeg et brev, til den europeiske


> menneskerettighetsdomstolen, i Strasbourg,


>


> og jeg sender med en kopi av det brevet, som vedlegg, for å forklare litt av


> hva som foregår.


>


> Så håper jeg dere har muligheten til å hjelpe meg med dette!


>


>


>


> Med vennlig hilsen


>


> Erik Ribsskog


>


>















Blog Archive

About Me

My photo
Overhørte på Rimi Bjørndal, (jeg jobbet som butikksjef/leder i ti år, i mange forskjellige butikker), i 2003, at jeg var forfulgt av 'mafian', mm. Har etter dette ikke fått rettighetene mine, i mange saker. Blogger derfor om problemer med å få rettigheter, mm. Mine memoarer, (Min Bok 1-10), kan også finnes på johncons-blogg, (se: 'Etiketter'). Jeg blogger også om slektsforskning, (etter at min danskfødte mormor, som var etter adelige/kongelige, døde i 2009). Har også vært såvidt innom Høyre/Unge Høyre, i sin tid. Har også studert informasjonsbehandling/IT/Computing, (på NHI, HiO IU og University of Sunderland). Har også bakgrunn fra handel og kontor, (grunnkurs, økonomi med markedsføring og data). Er/var også i Heimevernet, (etter at jeg ble overført dit, etter førstegangstjeneste i infanteriet, (og en rep-øvelse i mob-hæren), i forbindelse med omorganiseringer, i Forsvaret, etter den kalde krigen). Blir også utsatt for mye nettmobbing, mm. johncons-blogg, (og mine memoarer og nettbutikk), er kjent fra TV-programmet Tweet4Tweet, i 2012, (selv om jeg måtte klage, for programmet var veldig useriøst/nedlatende, mm.).