Showing posts with label Legal Services Commission (LSC).. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Legal Services Commission (LSC).. Show all posts

Monday, 19 January 2009

New complaint to the CAB.







Google Mail - New Complaint





















Google Mail





Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>








New Complaint




















Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>







Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM









To:

"Follows, Saffron" <saffron.follows@citizensadvice.org.uk>













Hi,





I'm sending you a new complaint.





The CAB has set me up with a 'Duty Solicitior' and an 'Employment Duty


Solicitor', for meetings.





But the Legal Services Commission told me today, on the phone, that


there is no Duty Solicitor scheme for employment-cases.





On Wikipedia, it says, that Duty Solicitiors are for people being


accused of a crime.





But I just wanted to bring up an employment-case, against a former employer.





I was wondering if you could please help me with making this clear,


because then I'd know how to go on


with dealing with the problems with the Solicitors and more.





Yours sincerely,





Erik Ribsskog




















---------- Forwarded message ----------


From: Kristian Khan <KristianKhan@liverpoolcab.org>


Date: Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:02 PM


Subject: RE:


To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>








Mr Ribsskog





Please acept my apologies for the dealy in replying to you - I have


been out of the office for 2 weeks.





Should you wish to contact the Chair then you would need to send you


email to: bureau@liverpoolcab.org





Regards





KRISTIAN KHAN


GENERAL UNIT COORDINATOR


________________________________


From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]


Sent: 08 October 2007 01:01


To: Kristian Khan


Subject: Re:





Hi,





I tryed to send your organisation an e-mail, to the e-mail address,


that is on your website (http://www.liverpoolcab.org/),


but the e-mail wasn't working, that's why I'm sending e-mail.





I was just wondering, to which e-mail address, I should send to, if I


wanted to contact the Chair, Liverpool Central CAB.





Thanks in advance for the reply!





Yours sincerely,





Erik Ribsskog











On 9/6/07, Kristian Khan <KristianKhan@liverpoolcab.org> wrote:


>


> Dear Mr Ribsskog.


>


> I am contacting you with regard to the complaint that you submitted to Saffron Follows, Citizens Advice complaints and policy officer, on 23rd May 2007.  I have now been able to undertake an investigation into the issues that you raised and my finding are detailed below.


>


>


>


> I understand that you attended the Bureau on 27th February 2007 and saw our Duty Solicitor Eleanor Pool on a free first interview basis about a harassment at work issue.  Ms Pool completed a B ureau Legal Information Service sheet in which she advised you that you possibly may have a claim for harassment but there was insufficient time to obtain full details and you would benefit from speaking to someone who could advise on criminal aspect as well. Ms Pool took the case back to her firm, Morecrofts. You state that on 28th February you received a letter from Eleanor Pool informing  you that they could take on the case at a cost of £140 per hour.  I take the the view that any action taken by a solicitor after we have facilitated a free first 1/2 hour interview is not our concern - these concerns would need to be addressed to the solicitor directly and therefore I do not concede that the Bureau is responsible for this


>


>


>


> On 5th April 2007 you had an appointment to see an Employment Duty Solicitor from EAD at 1.30pm.  EAD rang shortly before  your appointment to say that unfortunately no one from the firm was available to attend.  As this phonecall was received very close to 1.30pm you arrived minutes later.  (From my recollection the preceding client/s had failed to attend anyway).


>


>


>


> As is common practice I apologized to you explaining that it was not our fault and provided you with the phone number of EAD so that you could contact them yourself to arrange an appointment with them to replace the cancelled on of 5th April 2007.


>


>


>


> You state in your complaint that you rang EAD and spoke to Michael Reiner who took details of the case and advised  you that you were outside of the 3-month time limit to commence employment tribunal proceedings and that only in very limited circumstances could this time limit be extended.   You further state that you enquired about Legal Aid over the phone but Mr Reiner advised that he could not provide advice on this over the phone.


>


>


>


> As far as I am concerned you did received a free initial interview from EAD, ableit in telephone form, so as such I do not feel that  the Bureau was at fault.


>


>


>


> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


>


>


>


> Below I have taken each of the individual points that you made (in bold) and offered my response to each.  I have copied and pasted the complainant's points from the actual email complaint made by you.


>


>


>


>


>


> 1. I think the CAB should have set up a new meeting between the duty


>


> solicitor and myself, when the duty solicitor canceled the scheduled


>


> meeting there on 05/04/07.


>


>


>


> I did not set up a new meeting because the next employment duty solicitor slot was not until 24th April and that was fully booked.  Therefore the next appt. would have been at some point in May and I was reluctant to leave things this long as I was aware (without knowing the details of the case) that time limits may have been evident.  Furthermore, when Duty Sols. cancel they invariable see/speak to those clients at our request who were booked either on the same day or shortly after.


>


>


>


> 2. I think they should have informed me about the name of the duty


>


> solicitor that canceled the meeting. They didnt do this even if I asked


>


> them about this twice.


>


>


>


> We did not know the name; indeed we do not habitually know the names - the firms send different people and it was the firm who rang to cancel saying that no one from the firm was available to attend.


>


>


>


> 3. I dont think the CAB should have adivised me to contact the duty


>


> solicitors firm EAD on the phone on 5/4, since one needs to go through


>


> the documents of the case in detail, to see if one are eligable for legal


>


> aid. Which was what the scheduled meeting was supposed to be about.


>


>


>


> Please see response to Question 1 - furthermore we do not take responsibility for advising clients on their legal aid entitlements at the Reception desk at the time of booking a Duty Solicitor appt - this is why people are referred to the solicitor if they require specialist advice .


>


>


>


> 4. I dont think the CAB, like they for the meeting on 5/4, should set


>


> me up for a meeting with a Solicitors firms (EAD), that aren't based


>


> in Liverpool.  The Solicitor-firms that they set up to do task of Duty Solicitor


>


> representaton, should be based in Liverpool, for practical reasons,


>


> if someone wants to go to the Solicitors office to speak with


>


> someone there etc.


>


>


>


> EAD are based in Liverpool.  Their address is: Prospect House, Columbus Quay, Riverside Drive, Liverpool, L3 4DB.


>


>


>


>


>


> 5. I dont think the CAB should have given me the wrong number


>


> to the EAD solicitiors firm.


>


>


>


> Upheld - I accidentally gave you the fax number (708-0606) and for this I apologize.


>


>


>


> 6. I think the CAB should have the lights on in the parts of their offices


>


> where members of the public are recieved, and in their other public


>


> areas, during their opening hours.  This to insure that contacts between representatives from the CAB and


>


> members of the public are kept in an atmosphare that one would expect


>


> from a public place. (And not in an atmosphare that one would think


>


> belonged more to a privat place/situation.)  I think they should have the lights on during the opening hours, and that


>


> they should not arrange meetings with members of the public to be held


>


> with the lights off.  (Like they did when I went there for the Duty Solicitors meeting, and ended


>


> up first sitting waiting for several minutes in the dark, and then speaking with


>


> the CAB representative for several minutes in the dark, on 5/4).


>


>


>


> The lights were partially switched off as we were closed for lunch.  I switched them on again when I began speaking to you and I admit that they perhaps should have been left on fully in order to create a professional atmosphere.


>


>


>


> 7. I think that the CAB should have informed before the meeting with the


>


> Duty Solicitor from Morecrofts on 27/2, that the Morecrofts Solicitors firm


>


> only accepted payment from private founds.  And that Morecrofts didn't accept founding founded by the legal aid-


>


> programme, like the Duty Solicitor from Morecrofts, Eleanor Pool, informed


>


> me of on 22/3.


>


>


>


> Please see response to Question 3.


>


>


>


> 8. I think that the CAB should have informed me before the meeting with


>


> Duty Solicitor Eleanor Pool from Morecrofts there on 27/2, that the


>


> meeting only was scheduled to last for thirty minutes.   I wasnt made aware of this, untill Eleanor Pool first informed me of this when


>


> the thirty minutes had passed.


>


>


>


> As far as I am aware, clients are advised that the Duty Solicitor service is a "free first 1/2.  I can confirm that both Reception staff and myself make clients aware of this at the time of booking the appointment.


>


>


>


> 9. I think the CAB should have explained to me about the legal aid system,


>


> and how it works, before they set me up for the meeting with Duty Solicitor


>


> Eleanor Pool from Morecrofts there on 27/2.  Especially since this was an employment-case (like I told them that the


>


> police had told me to tell them that it was).


>


>


>


> Please see response to Question 3.


>


>


>


> 10. I also think that the solicitor I got to speak with on the phone (about when


>


> one would need a criminal solicitor), when I was at the CAB on 20/3, should


>


> have explained to me what her name was, and which solicitors firm she was


>


> calling from.  I was put in a room at the CAB, and told to wait untill the solicitor called me.


>


> But when I answered, I picked up the phone and said 'yes hello this is Erik


>


> Ribsskog speaking', but the solicitor didnt say eighter what her name was


>


> or the name of her company was, she just asked what my questions were.


>


>  Also, when I had finished speaking with the solicitor on the phone, then


>


> the CAB advisor had starting speaking with another member of the public


>


> there, without informing me that our meeting was finished, and without


>


> me being alowed to finish explaining why I had gone there.


>


> I had gone there to ask about two things.


>


> 1. About when one needs a criminal advisor, and 2. how the legal aid system works.


>


>


>


> But I only got to tell about the first point, before I was put in the room to


>


> wait for the phone from the solicitor. Without me first being informed that


>


> my meeting with the CAB advisor had finished.


>


>


>


> If the solicitor failed to give her name then I am afraid that I do not see how the Bureau was to blame for that.  We cannot be held responsible for what a solicitor does or does not do.   You state that you attended CAB on 20th March 2007 and spoke to a criminal solicitor by phone, and then asked us about Legal Aid and was advised to check the CLS Eligibility calculator. If the Bureau was fully booked on that day then you may well have been advised to check this calculator as we like to offer some "signposting" advice that will enable the client to undertake some work/research on this case prior to their appointment at the Bureau.  The CLS calculator advised that it could not assist you as you were self-employed and so you returned to the CAB and was given the appt. 5th April 2007.


>


>


>


> 11. So I think that the CAB advisor should have told me that the meeting


>


> there on 20/3 was finished, before ending the meeting.


>


> Since this would have given me the chance to explain that there were more


>


> things that I wanted to bring up in the meeting.


>


>


>


> It would seem that there was no availabilty for you to see an adviser on 20th March 2007 and this may explain why you were only given "signposting" advice i.e. be allowed to talk to a solicitor on the phone and then be given the CLS calculator website.


>


>


>


> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


>


>


>


> In conclusion I have investigated your concerns and I hope that you are satisfied with this response, however you should remain dissatisfied then you can contact the following:


>


>


>


> THE CHAIR


>


> LIVERPOOL CENTRAL CAB


>


> 1ST FLOOR


>


> STATE HOUSE


>


> 22 DALE STREET


>


> LIVERPOOL


>


> L2 4TR


>


>


>


> Yours Sincerley


>


>


>


> KRISTIAN KHAN


>


> GENERAL UNIT COORDINATOR.


>


>













Thursday, 21 August 2008

E-mail to the LSC.







Google Mail - Complaint





















Google Mail





Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>








Complaint




















Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>







Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:40 AM









To:

Fiona Dillon <fiona.dillon@legalservices.gov.uk>













Hi,


 


I'm sending you this e-mail, since what I wanted to know, was, how one should go forward,


if one wanted to complain against unproffesional conduct, from a law-firm, in connection


with the Duty Solicitiors Programme.


 


(Regardless of if one were given legal-aid or not.)


 


Thanks in advance for the help!


 


Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Jul 7, 2008 11:11 AM


Subject: Re: Complaint
To: Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk>

 


Hi,


 


that's right, I did not recieve legal aid, since Morecrofts, said that they didn't participate, in the legal aid


programme.



(They said this about a month after the initial meeting, like explained in the complaint).


 


However, the Law Society, if I remember right, told me, that if I wanted to complain, about unprofessional


conduct, from law-firms, in connection with the Duty Solicitor programme, then I should contact the LSC,


I was told.


 


So that was why I was contacting your offices, earlier this year, I think it was.


 


So the complaint wasn't really in regards to the Legal Aid Programme, it was to do with law-firms, and 


unproffesional conduct etc., from them (Morecrofts and EAD), in connection with the Duty Solicitor Programme.



Yours sincerely,


 


Erik Ribsskog

 




On 7/7/08, Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr Ribsskog

Mrs Dillon forwarded your complaint to me as I am the Account Manager
for Morecrofts. I have investigated your complaint and find that you did


not received Legal Aid and did not become a client of Morecrofts.
Therefore, I am unable to take your complaint any further.

Kind regards

Sarah Thompson

Account Manager


>>> "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com> 02/07/2008 20:04 >>>


Hi,

there has been a lot going on regarding this case.

I was wondering, is this e-mail to do with the e-mail I sent to Fiona
Dillon
at the LSC,
earlier this week?

Thanks in advance for the reply!



Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog


On 7/2/08, Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:


>
> Dear Mr Ribsskog
>
> I have investigated your complaint and found that you did not
receive
> advice funded by the Legal Services Commission. Therefore, I am
unable
> to to investigate the matter further as it is not a Legal Services


> Commission matter. It also seems from the correspondence that this
> matter is also outside the Law Society's jurisdiction. Therefore,  I
> cannot see how you can progress this complaint further.
>


> Kind regards
>
> Sarah Thompson
>
> Account Manager
>
>
>
************************************************************************************
> Disclaimer
>


> This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely
for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its
unauthorised
> use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not


the
> intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by
return
> e-mail.
>
> Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be
intercepted and
> read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether


to send
> information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services
Commission
> are available from
> http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/aboutus/our_regional_network.asp


>
> The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record
and
> retain any incoming and outgoing e-mails for security reasons and
for
> monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission


policy on
> staff use. E-mail monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and
e-mail
> content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken
> when writing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. No contracts


can be
> entered into on our behalf by e-mail.
>
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
not
> necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.
>


> The Legal Services Commission checks all e-mails and attachments for
known
> viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at
your own
> risk.
>
>
************************************************************************************


>
>
















Monday, 7 July 2008

E-mail to the LSC, 7/7/08.







Google Mail - Complaint





















Google Mail





Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>








Complaint




















Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>







Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM









To:

Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk>













Hi,


 


that's right, I did not recieve legal aid, since Morecrofts, said that they didn't participate, in the legal aid


programme.



(They said this about a month after the initial meeting, like explained in the complaint).


 


However, the Law Society, if I remember right, told me, that if I wanted to complain, about unprofessional


conduct, from law-firms, in connection with the Duty Solicitor programme, then I should contact the LSC,


I was told.


 


So that was why I was contacting your offices, earlier this year, I think it was.


 


So the complaint wasn't really in regards to the Legal Aid Programme, it was to do with law-firms, and 


unproffesional conduct etc., from them (Morecrofts and EAD), in connection with the Duty Solicitor Programme.



Yours sincerely,


 


Erik Ribsskog

 


On 7/7/08, Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr Ribsskog

Mrs Dillon forwarded your complaint to me as I am the Account Manager
for Morecrofts. I have investigated your complaint and find that you did


not received Legal Aid and did not become a client of Morecrofts.
Therefore, I am unable to take your complaint any further.

Kind regards

Sarah Thompson

Account Manager


>>> "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com> 02/07/2008 20:04 >>>


Hi,

there has been a lot going on regarding this case.

I was wondering, is this e-mail to do with the e-mail I sent to Fiona
Dillon
at the LSC,
earlier this week?

Thanks in advance for the reply!



Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog


On 7/2/08, Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:
>
> Dear Mr Ribsskog


>
> I have investigated your complaint and found that you did not
receive
> advice funded by the Legal Services Commission. Therefore, I am
unable
> to to investigate the matter further as it is not a Legal Services


> Commission matter. It also seems from the correspondence that this
> matter is also outside the Law Society's jurisdiction. Therefore,  I
> cannot see how you can progress this complaint further.
>


> Kind regards
>
> Sarah Thompson
>
> Account Manager
>
>
>
************************************************************************************
> Disclaimer
>


> This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely
for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its
unauthorised
> use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not


the
> intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by
return
> e-mail.
>
> Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be
intercepted and
> read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether


to send
> information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services
Commission
> are available from
> http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/aboutus/our_regional_network.asp


>
> The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record
and
> retain any incoming and outgoing e-mails for security reasons and
for
> monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission


policy on
> staff use. E-mail monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and
e-mail
> content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken
> when writing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. No contracts


can be
> entered into on our behalf by e-mail.
>
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
not
> necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.
>


> The Legal Services Commission checks all e-mails and attachments for
known
> viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at
your own
> risk.
>
>
************************************************************************************


>
>












Wednesday, 2 July 2008

E-mail to the LSC, 2/7/08.







Google Mail - Complaint





















Google Mail





Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>








Complaint




















Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>







Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:04 PM









To:

Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk>













Hi,


 


there has been a lot going on regarding this case.



I was wondering, is this e-mail to do with the e-mail I sent to Fiona Dillon at the LSC,


earlier this week?



Thanks in advance for the reply!


 


Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog

 


On 7/2/08, Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr Ribsskog

I have investigated your complaint and found that you did not receive
advice funded by the Legal Services Commission. Therefore, I am unable


to to investigate the matter further as it is not a Legal Services
Commission matter. It also seems from the correspondence that this
matter is also outside the Law Society's jurisdiction. Therefore,  I
cannot see how you can progress this complaint further.



Kind regards

Sarah Thompson

Account Manager

************************************************************************************
Disclaimer

This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.



Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether to send information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services Commission are available from http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/aboutus/our_regional_network.asp



The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record and retain any incoming and outgoing e-mails for security reasons and for monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission policy on staff use. E-mail monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and e-mail content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when writing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. No contracts can be entered into on our behalf by e-mail.



Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.

The Legal Services Commission checks all e-mails and attachments for known viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk.


************************************************************************************















Saturday, 28 June 2008

E-mail to Fiona Dillon, Legal Services Commission (LSC), 29/6/08.







Google Mail - Update/Fwd: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.





















Google Mail





Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>








Update/Fwd: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.




















Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>







Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 2:43 AM









To:

Fiona.Dillon@legalservices.gov.uk













Hi,


 


I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, that's why I'm trying to send it again.


 


Hope this is alright!



Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Date: Jun 13, 2008 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: Update/Fwd: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.
To: Fiona Dillon <Fiona.Dillon@legalservices.gov.uk>



 


Hi,


 


I can't see that I've heard anything more from you, regarding this, so I was just wondering


if it would be possible, to please get an update, regarding what's going on, surrounding this.


 


Hope this is alright!


 


Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog

 




On 2/26/08, Fiona Dillon <Fiona.Dillon@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:

Mr Ribsskog,

I have contacted both firms in  order for them to give an explanation
of themselves and will cony=tact you as soon as I receive a reply.



Yours sincerely,

Fiona Dillon.

Mrs Fiona Dillon
CDS Administrator
Legal Services Commission

0151-242-5268 or ext 5268
0151-242-5396 Fax


>>> "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com> 22/02/2008 15:51 >>>


Hi,

I'm refering to my earlier e-mail today, and I'm also sending you this
update, an e-mail I sent the
LGO today, that describes more, about the complaint-process, regarding
the
complaints on


Morecrofts and EAD, that I sent you today, and how these complaints
were
dealt with by
the Law Society, and the LGO.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------


From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 22, 2008 3:43 PM
Subject: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.


To: lso@olso.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk




Hi,

I called the LGO today, on 0161 839 7262, and I got confirmed, like
Mr.
Gavin
Brown, Operations Manager, is explaining in the letter from 14/2, that
the
LGO, haven't got an appeal-possibility, included in the


complaint-process.

So I've decided that I'm going to follow the Operations Managers
advice, and
contact the Ministry of Justice, regarding the problems that I
orginially
wanted to appeal about.



This is going to take me a bit of time, since I need to go through the
details
of both comlaints. (Ref. 39651 and ref. 40080), and I'm in a busy
periode at
work, so this is propably going to take me at least a couple of weeks.



Anyway, from what I'm suspecting, when I'm using my judgement,
regarding
how many problems I think it was with the Law Society, regarding the
complaints on the Morecrofts and EAD law-firms.

Due to that I think these problems, with the Law Society were many and


serious,
and due to that I can't see the seriousnes of the problems being
mirrored at
all,
in the LGO reports, due to this, I decieded to call your offices today,
to
check
if it really is so, that you haven't got a possibility to appeal


included
in your
complaint-process.

Since I found out, that there is no such possibility to appeal, then I
asked
your
representative, who answered the phone, if one have the possibilty to
complain


about the LGO representatives.

Since I suspect, that there could be maybe some form of corruption
involved,
and that this is the reason, that I couldn't see that the Law Society
problems
where mirrored in the LGO reports.



If it so, that there is some type of corruption, that is causing this,
that
I can't
see the problems mirrored in the reports, then I think this is serious,
and
that
it should contact the person at LGO responsible for handling


complaints
about LGO representatives, regarding this.

So this is why I'm sending this e-mail, so that you get the chance to
have
a look at this, and get a chance to sort the problems that I suspect


could
exist in some form, causing this, the to me obvious misproportions
between how I think the Law Society acted, and how the Law Society are
being described in your report.

So I hope very much that you have the chance to have a look at this!



Please just tell me if there is anything more I should inform about!

I'm also sending a copy of this e-mail, to the Ministry of Justice,
since
I'm going
to contact them later, regarding these problems, so I thought it would


be
right
to be informing them about the problems, as early as possible.

Hope this is alright, and that you have a chance to have a look at
this!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

************************************************************************************


Disclaimer

This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.



Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether to send information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services Commission are available from http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/aboutus/our_regional_network.asp



The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record and retain any incoming and outgoing e-mails for security reasons and for monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission policy on staff use. E-mail monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and e-mail content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when writing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. No contracts can be entered into on our behalf by e-mail.



Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.

The Legal Services Commission checks all e-mails and attachments for known viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk.


************************************************************************************

















Friday, 13 June 2008

E-mail to the Legal Services Commision, 13/6/08.







Google Mail - Update/Fwd: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.





















Google Mail





Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>








Update/Fwd: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.




















Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>







Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:13 AM









To:

Fiona Dillon <Fiona.Dillon@legalservices.gov.uk>













Hi,


 


I can't see that I've heard anything more from you, regarding this, so I was just wondering


if it would be possible, to please get an update, regarding what's going on, surrounding this.


 


Hope this is alright!


 


Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog

 


On 2/26/08, Fiona Dillon <Fiona.Dillon@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:

Mr Ribsskog,

I have contacted both firms in  order for them to give an explanation
of themselves and will cony=tact you as soon as I receive a reply.



Yours sincerely,

Fiona Dillon.

Mrs Fiona Dillon
CDS Administrator
Legal Services Commission

0151-242-5268 or ext 5268
0151-242-5396 Fax


>>> "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com> 22/02/2008 15:51 >>>


Hi,

I'm refering to my earlier e-mail today, and I'm also sending you this
update, an e-mail I sent the
LGO today, that describes more, about the complaint-process, regarding
the
complaints on


Morecrofts and EAD, that I sent you today, and how these complaints
were
dealt with by
the Law Society, and the LGO.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------


From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 22, 2008 3:43 PM
Subject: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.
To: lso@olso.gsi.gov.uk


Cc: general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk


Hi,

I called the LGO today, on 0161 839 7262, and I got confirmed, like
Mr.
Gavin
Brown, Operations Manager, is explaining in the letter from 14/2, that


the
LGO, haven't got an appeal-possibility, included in the
complaint-process.

So I've decided that I'm going to follow the Operations Managers
advice, and
contact the Ministry of Justice, regarding the problems that I


orginially
wanted to appeal about.

This is going to take me a bit of time, since I need to go through the
details
of both comlaints. (Ref. 39651 and ref. 40080), and I'm in a busy
periode at
work, so this is propably going to take me at least a couple of weeks.



Anyway, from what I'm suspecting, when I'm using my judgement,
regarding
how many problems I think it was with the Law Society, regarding the
complaints on the Morecrofts and EAD law-firms.

Due to that I think these problems, with the Law Society were many and


serious,
and due to that I can't see the seriousnes of the problems being
mirrored at
all,
in the LGO reports, due to this, I decieded to call your offices today,
to
check
if it really is so, that you haven't got a possibility to appeal


included
in your
complaint-process.

Since I found out, that there is no such possibility to appeal, then I
asked
your
representative, who answered the phone, if one have the possibilty to
complain


about the LGO representatives.

Since I suspect, that there could be maybe some form of corruption
involved,
and that this is the reason, that I couldn't see that the Law Society
problems
where mirrored in the LGO reports.



If it so, that there is some type of corruption, that is causing this,
that
I can't
see the problems mirrored in the reports, then I think this is serious,
and
that
it should contact the person at LGO responsible for handling


complaints
about LGO representatives, regarding this.

So this is why I'm sending this e-mail, so that you get the chance to
have
a look at this, and get a chance to sort the problems that I suspect


could
exist in some form, causing this, the to me obvious misproportions
between how I think the Law Society acted, and how the Law Society are
being described in your report.

So I hope very much that you have the chance to have a look at this!



Please just tell me if there is anything more I should inform about!

I'm also sending a copy of this e-mail, to the Ministry of Justice,
since
I'm going
to contact them later, regarding these problems, so I thought it would


be
right
to be informing them about the problems, as early as possible.

Hope this is alright, and that you have a chance to have a look at
this!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

************************************************************************************


Disclaimer

This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.



Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether to send information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services Commission are available from http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/aboutus/our_regional_network.asp



The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record and retain any incoming and outgoing e-mails for security reasons and for monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission policy on staff use. E-mail monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and e-mail content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when writing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. No contracts can be entered into on our behalf by e-mail.



Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.

The Legal Services Commission checks all e-mails and attachments for known viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk.


************************************************************************************

















E-mail to the Legal Services Commission, 13/6/08.







Google Mail - Update/Fwd: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.





















Google Mail





Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>








Update/Fwd: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.




















Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>







Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:13 AM









To:

Fiona Dillon <Fiona.Dillon@legalservices.gov.uk>













Hi,


 


I can't see that I've heard anything more from you, regarding this, so I was just wondering


if it would be possible, to please get an update, regarding what's going on, surrounding this.


 


Hope this is alright!


 


Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog

 


On 2/26/08, Fiona Dillon <Fiona.Dillon@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:

Mr Ribsskog,

I have contacted both firms in  order for them to give an explanation
of themselves and will cony=tact you as soon as I receive a reply.



Yours sincerely,

Fiona Dillon.

Mrs Fiona Dillon
CDS Administrator
Legal Services Commission

0151-242-5268 or ext 5268
0151-242-5396 Fax


>>> "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com> 22/02/2008 15:51 >>>


Hi,

I'm refering to my earlier e-mail today, and I'm also sending you this
update, an e-mail I sent the
LGO today, that describes more, about the complaint-process, regarding
the
complaints on


Morecrofts and EAD, that I sent you today, and how these complaints
were
dealt with by
the Law Society, and the LGO.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------


From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 22, 2008 3:43 PM
Subject: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.
To: lso@olso.gsi.gov.uk


Cc: general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk


Hi,

I called the LGO today, on 0161 839 7262, and I got confirmed, like
Mr.
Gavin
Brown, Operations Manager, is explaining in the letter from 14/2, that


the
LGO, haven't got an appeal-possibility, included in the
complaint-process.

So I've decided that I'm going to follow the Operations Managers
advice, and
contact the Ministry of Justice, regarding the problems that I


orginially
wanted to appeal about.

This is going to take me a bit of time, since I need to go through the
details
of both comlaints. (Ref. 39651 and ref. 40080), and I'm in a busy
periode at
work, so this is propably going to take me at least a couple of weeks.



Anyway, from what I'm suspecting, when I'm using my judgement,
regarding
how many problems I think it was with the Law Society, regarding the
complaints on the Morecrofts and EAD law-firms.

Due to that I think these problems, with the Law Society were many and


serious,
and due to that I can't see the seriousnes of the problems being
mirrored at
all,
in the LGO reports, due to this, I decieded to call your offices today,
to
check
if it really is so, that you haven't got a possibility to appeal


included
in your
complaint-process.

Since I found out, that there is no such possibility to appeal, then I
asked
your
representative, who answered the phone, if one have the possibilty to
complain


about the LGO representatives.

Since I suspect, that there could be maybe some form of corruption
involved,
and that this is the reason, that I couldn't see that the Law Society
problems
where mirrored in the LGO reports.



If it so, that there is some type of corruption, that is causing this,
that
I can't
see the problems mirrored in the reports, then I think this is serious,
and
that
it should contact the person at LGO responsible for handling


complaints
about LGO representatives, regarding this.

So this is why I'm sending this e-mail, so that you get the chance to
have
a look at this, and get a chance to sort the problems that I suspect


could
exist in some form, causing this, the to me obvious misproportions
between how I think the Law Society acted, and how the Law Society are
being described in your report.

So I hope very much that you have the chance to have a look at this!



Please just tell me if there is anything more I should inform about!

I'm also sending a copy of this e-mail, to the Ministry of Justice,
since
I'm going
to contact them later, regarding these problems, so I thought it would


be
right
to be informing them about the problems, as early as possible.

Hope this is alright, and that you have a chance to have a look at
this!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

************************************************************************************


Disclaimer

This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.



Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether to send information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services Commission are available from http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/aboutus/our_regional_network.asp



The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record and retain any incoming and outgoing e-mails for security reasons and for monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission policy on staff use. E-mail monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and e-mail content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when writing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. No contracts can be entered into on our behalf by e-mail.



Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.

The Legal Services Commission checks all e-mails and attachments for known viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk.


************************************************************************************

















Tuesday, 13 May 2008

Svar på e-post sendt leder i Høyre, Erna Solberg, fra Marianne Fagerli, førstekonsulent, Høyres stortingsgruppe. (In Norwegian).

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.

Fagerli Marianne <marianne.fagerli@stortinget.no>

Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:59 PM

To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Tusen takk for dine tilbakemeldinger. Jeg skal bringe denne videre til Erna Solberg.

Med vennlig hilsen

Marianne Fagerli
førstekonsulent
Høyres stortingsgruppe
tlf: 23 31 33 46
mobil: 416 46 094

-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:
eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sendt: 25. april 2008 20:33
Til:
erna.solberg@hoyre.no
Emne: Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.

Hei Erna Solberg,

sorry at jeg driver å skrive til deg, sånn helt uten videre.


Men jeg ble så imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som du presanterte på Høyre-møte, tidligere

denne uke, om at dere ønsker å fordele makten i samfunnet, og at dere ikke ønsker, at det skal gå

politikk i enkeltavgjørelse, om enkeltmenneskers skjebner osv.


Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg skjønte det.


Og det synes jeg virker som en veldig god ide, siden det virker litt for meg, som at det er en ny elite,

som, mer eller mindre, styrer og 'herjer' som de vil i landet nå, uten noe tanke i det hele tatt, for

medborgernes universale menneskerettigheter, og sivile rettigheter.


Jeg blir i hvertfall tullet med, av alt som heter myndigheter i landet, det vil si Kripos, Politidirektoratet,

Justisdepartementet, Ambassaden i London, Konsulatet i Liverpool (hvor jeg bor), UD; SMK,

Sivilombudsmannen, Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus, Spesialenheten, og også uavhengige

organisasjoner, som Amnesty Norge, og Norsk Røde Kors og Statsministerens Kontor.


Pluss da i tillegg, organisasjoner i Storbritannia, som det Britiske Politiet, IPCC, Liverpool City Council,

the Local Government Ombudsman, the Financial Ombudsman, the Citizens Advice Bureau,

the Law Society, the Legal Services Ombudsman, the Legal Services Commission, the Ministry

of Justice, Amnesty UK.


Listen går bare videre og videre, det virker som at det er noe lignende, av det som er beskrevet i den

boken, som heter 'Mafiaen i Eiker', hvor en enkeltperson, blir systematisk motarbeidet, av offentlige

myndigheter, til de klarer å knuse han.

Det virker ikke, som at det, nå for tiden, er noe som helst tanke for, hva som er rett og galt, og hva

som er folks rettigheter.

Jeg har ikke klart å finne noen, ikke en eneste organisasjon, som bryr seg en døyt, om hva som

er rett og galt, og hva som er folks sivile rettigheter, og folks menneskerettigheter.


Så jeg synes det var veldig bra å høre om det programmet dere har lagt fram nå i Høyre, hvor dere

ønsker å motarbeide nettopp slik behandling av enkeltpersoner, fra myndighetene.


For dette synes jeg ikke, sånn som jeg ser det, at er verdig for et demokratisk samfunn.


Og det viker som at det er like ille, her i Storbritannia, hvor jeg måtte flykte til, ettersom, at

jeg ble jaget fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, på 35 års dagen min, i july 2005.

Av folk som hadde våpen og hunder, så det kan virke som at det var noe politi, eller noe,

for meg.


Og jeg overhørte, at de sa de ønsket å skyte meg, så det var bare flaks at jeg kom meg unna.

Så hva det er som foregår, det vet ikke jeg.


Jeg får ikke noe hjelp, fra noen som helst myndigheter, eller private/uavhengige organisasjoner.


Så sånn som jeg ser det, så har verden gått helt av hengslene.


Jeg prøver å skrive, om det skjer, på en blogg jeg har, med håp, om at noen kanskje skal reflektere,

eller reagere, over det som foregår.


Pressen har jeg kontaktet flere ganger, de er ikke interessert i å hjelpe meg.

Så at pressen, er involvert, i noe samrøre, med offentlig forvaltning, og også til og med frivillige/private

organisasjoner, i både Norge og Storbritannia.


Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg ser det, at dette er realiteten, i dag, i min situasjon, jeg klarer ikke få noe

som helst hjelp/råd/informasjon, om hva det egentlig er som foregår.

Jeg har kontaktet politet i Norge og Storbritannia, veldig mange ganger, men de vil ikke fortelle hva som

foregår, så jeg tror nok at du har rett i det du la fram, i det prinsipprogrammet, at myndighetene, nå

for tiden, ikke bryr seg noe om folks rettigheter, men at de lar politikken sin, gå foran folks rettigheter.

Og dette er jeg enig, som i det det stod i en nettavis, at du sa, at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert.


Så da kan jeg gi den tilbakemeldingen, at sånn som jeg ser det, så har du og Høyre helt skjønt hva som

foregår.


Så da må jeg innrømme, at jeg ble imponert, når jeg leste det prinsipprogrammet til Høyre, i en nettavis

her, tidligere denne uken.


Så det synes jeg var veldig bra!

Jeg var faktisk selv, på et eller to møter, i Høires Hus, skrives det vel, i Oslo, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet.


Det var vel, i forbindelse med Unge Høyres program, til skolevalgene osv., i forkant, av kommunevalget, i 91.

Og da, pratet jeg og en kamerat, i hvertfall tidligere kamerat, Magne Winnem, med noen av Unge Høyres,

politiske strateger, eller i hvertfall, de som skulle utarbeide valgkampmateriale til Unge Høyre da.


Så fikk vi si vår mening om det, vi var jo fra Røyken og Svelvik vi, så hadde vel kanskje et litt annet

perspektiv, enn de fleste som var på møtet i Høires Hus der, tror jeg, for dem var nok mest fra Oslo

Vest osv., så da kanksje vi la merke til ting, som vi trodde ville gi et dårlig inntrykk, i f.eks. i Buskerud,

eller Vestfold da.


Men jeg får håpe at vi ikke fikk dem til å moderere programmet for mye.

Jeg husker ikke navna på de her nå.


Den eneste jeg husker navnet på, det var at den var en jentene der, som het Huitfeldt vel, og det var ikke

Anniken Huitfeldt, men ei som var datter av en Høyre politiker, eller noe tror jeg.


Det var kameraten min, Winnem, som kjente til dette.


Men samme det.

Så jeg må innrømme det, at jeg ble veldig imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som Høyre la frem, her

nå nettopp.

Jeg hadde ikke tid, til å drive med politikk, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet, og jeg synes egentlig ikke, at det

var rett av meg, som bare hadde sittet på skolebenken hele livet, til da, å bli aktiv i Unge Høyre osv.,

og diskutere, og si at dette er best, osv., når jeg ikke hadde noe erfaring fra annet enn skolebenken selv.


Jeg synes det ble litt dumt, og visste ikke om jeg da egentlig visste noe særlig, om de temaene, som

ble diskutert, på møtet der osv.

Det var vel mest at jeg gjentok det, som lærerne hadde sagt på skolen, at Norge burde satse på kunnskap,

og forskning.

Men jeg hadde jo ikke helt oversikten selv, jeg mener det jeg synes ikke det var noe hensikt, for meg,

som ikke kjente så mye til verden, å drive for mye med politikk, ettersom, at jeg jo ikke egentlig hadde

noe særlig livserfaring, og da ville det vel antagelig ikke vært så hensiktsmessig, at jeg skulle prøve,

å finne løsninger på alt mulig forskjellige, når jeg ikke selv syntes, at jeg visste så særlig mye om

hvordan verden var.

Så derfor, så ble det ikke til, at jeg gikk noe mer på møter på Høires Hus osv.


Men, i de siste årene, så har jeg jo skjønt det, at det er noe, som ikke er som det burde være, i det hele

tatt, i Norge. (Og nok også andre land).


Så nå skjønner jeg jo det, at det er faktisk er veldige viktige temaer, dette med maktfordeliing, og

det som kan synes, å være samarbeid, mellom forskjellige offentlige etater etc., for å motarbeide

enkeltpersoner.


Det virker som at det en mafia i offentlig adminstrasjon.


Og jeg har skrevet før, at det kan virke som at det er noe i forbindelse med noe New World Order agenda.


At man skal ha en underklasse, som blir styrt og kontrollert helt, av den nye overklassen/den nye eliten.


Og middelklassen, den forsvinner, så det blir bare eliten, og undersåttene igjen, så og si, kan det

virke som, for meg.

I hverfall så synes jeg det jeg har opplevd de siste årene, passer godt med det jeg har hørt om, angående

de her New World Order-teoriene da.

Men jeg vet ikke helt, jeg lurer litt på, om kanskje det hadde vært smart for meg, å for eksempel begynne

med politikk?

For eksempel, disse statelige og offentlige myndigheter, inkludert politiet, virker det som, de er jo i hælene

mine hele tida, så det er ikke fred å få, må man vel si.

Og det virker som at det er 'Street Theater' og 'Group Stalking' operasjoner, som iverksettes rundt meg,

av noe overvåkningspoliti, eller hva det kan være.


Enda jeg har aldri vært noe kriminell, og jeg har jobbet og betalt skatt hele livet.

Det virker som at disse operasjonene, som er på nettet, hvis jeg diskuterer, f.eks. på Veggavisen,

eller en Facebook diskusjonsgruppe, så dukker det opp en organsiert gjeng, som mobber og trakasserer

meg systematisk og planlagt.

Og dette har også skjedd når jeg går ut døra. At det virker som at politiet, eller noen andre, har en slags

overvåkningaksjon, for å få brutt meg ned, virker det som.


Dette går på ting som 'Mind Control', virker det som for meg.


Og dette er ting, som går på, at de bryter ned folk, så de blir traumatiske, osv., og så, så får de kontroll

på personene, og personene gjøre det, som dette nettverket vil.


Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, jeg har lest om det på nettet, og jeg kjenner igjen det som står

beskrevet der.

Jeg skal legge ved noen linker, til blogg osv., som forklarer mer om det jeg mener.

Nå bor jo jeg i Storbritannia da, så jeg vet ikke om Høyre har noe regler, for at man må bo i Norge,

hvis man har lyst til drive med politikk osv., men det går vel mye på møter osv., så da er det vel

antagelig en fordel å bo i Norge ja.

Men jeg, er som jeg sier, nå i det siste, etter at jeg har fått tenkt gjennom dette.


Jeg er en flyktning fra Norge jeg nå.

Jeg ble jagd bort fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, sommeren 2005, av noen folk med våpen

og hunder, som jeg ikke vet hvem er, eller hvorfor de skulle ha tak i meg, og skyte meg, som jeg

overhørte de sa, når jeg var inni skogen ved gården der.

Så jeg har tatt kontakt med FN's høykommisær for flyktninger, avdeling Storbritannia, for å få råd om

hva jeg burde gjøre i forbindelse med dette.


De sa bare, at de kunne ikke involvere seg i enkeltsaker, og ga meg to telefonnumre, til et par

advokatfirmaer, tror jeg det var, som jeg ikke har kontaket enda, for jeg lurer på om dette ikke er

mer generelle tema, som kanskje burde vært tatt opp med f.eks. FN da


Jeg vil jo gjerne vite, f.eks., om jeg formelt oppfyller kravene, til å være en flyktning, for da ville kanskje

dette hjelpe, til å få politiet i Norge, til å gi meg råd, informasjon, eller hjelp i forbindelse med den

situasjonen, som er, at jeg blir forfulgt av noe slags kriminelt nettverk da, virker det som.


Hvis det ikke er politiet da, som en jeg pratet med på nettet, mente det kunne være.

For dette har holdt på, siden 2003, og det er helt umulig å få et eneste råd., eller ord omtrent, ut

av politiet, så hva det er som foregår, det er vanskelig å si, men at noe er galt, det er nok sikkert.

Jeg vet ikke helt hvorfor, at jeg bestemte meg for å skrive den her e-posten, men mye av grunnen,

var vel, at jeg synes det prinsipprogrammet som dere presanterte, i avisene, tidligere denne uken,

var veldig bra, så det virker i hvertfall som at det er noen oppegående folk igjen i landet, synes jeg,

og det er ikke så mange andre jeg kan si det om, i forbindelse med de tingene som foregår nå,

synes jeg det virker som.


Så det synes jeg var veldig positivt, og jeg tror Høyres politikk, med konservatisme, osv., ikke

vil være på langt nær så ille, som AP's New World Order politikk, vil jeg kalle det, med en ny

elite, som får i pose og sekk, og men en underklasse, som må stå i køer, til Aker Sykehus,

osv., og dit ville ikke jeg dratt for å operere eller noe igjen, etter at jeg opererte kneet der,

i 1996.

Der var det mye rart, jeg mistenker at dette nettverket, av offentlig forvaltning, som er beskrevet,

i den boken, 'mafiaen i Eiker', jeg mistenker at dette eller lignende netteverk, også har sine

representanter, på sykehusene.


Uten at jeg skal gå mer i detalj om det nå.

Jeg tror, at i et samfunn med Høyres politikk, så vil det være mulig, for enkeltmennesker, å komme

seg f.eks. over fra arbeiderklassen, eller hvilket utrykk man skal bruke nå, og oppover, til middelklassen,

eller overklassen da, hvis de jobber og står på, uten å bli motarbeidet, av diverse jantelover, som

kanskje egentlig er et slags nettverk da, i tillegg til de netteverkene som er i offentlig admistrasjon osv.

Men jeg tror ikke, at folk har så særlig muligheter, til å komme seg oppover, i samfunnet, i det

samfunnet som vi har nå, med AP's poltitikk, med en overlegen elite, et såkalt plutokrati, som

det skrives i avisene hele tiden.


Jeg tror i et sånt samfunn, så er det så og si umulig, å komme seg over, fra 'undersåttene', til

denne eliten, som styrer, i dette plutokratiet da.


Som jeg selv har selv mange referanser til, i aviser osv, at Norge er egentlig et plutokrati.

Og da mistenker jeg, at dette er samfunnet, som man får av, AP's politikk, med overformynderi,

en ny elite, som kan kjøpe seg forbi køene, på de dårligere og dårligere offentlige sykhusene.


Så dette AP/New World Order/den nye eliten samfunnet, det tror jeg man burde gjøre noe med,

hvis man har noe som helst sympati, med de mange, altså flertallet som havner i denne,

'undersått' gruppen.


Så dette håper jeg at det er mulig å gjøre noe med, dette AP-samfunnet.

Er 2/3 samfunnet de kaller det?

Betyr dette, at den siste tredelen ikke har noen rettigheter, men får rettighetene sine ignorert,

av offentlig forvaltning og non-profit organisasjoner osv.

Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, må jeg innrømme


At noen av de her 2/3 av folka i samfunnet da, har bestemt seg for, at jeg er i den siste tredelen,

og da ikke har noen rettigheter, og alle kan fritt tulle med meg.


Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg.


Hvordan dette blir organisert i detalj, det kan jeg ikke si sikkert, men det er vel muligens noe

frimurere, eller Illuminati f.eks., inne i bildet da, uten at jeg skal si dette hundre prosent sikkert.


Men jeg ønsker i hvertfall lykke til videre med den høyre prisippolitikken, som jeg synes virket

veldig bra.


Jeg tror, at hvis Høyre, klarer å forklare velgerne, kanskje litt enklere, hva dette vil si, med at

det går politikk i enkeltsaker, og at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert av myndighetene.


Kanskje hvis Høyre tok fram noen eksempler, på hva som faktisk foregår, av maktmisbruk

og det som værre er, fra myndighetene.


For jeg tror ikke det er alle som skjønner det som står i prinsipprogrammet om universale

rettigheter, og at avgjørelser i enkeltsaker, tas med en poltisk agenda i bakhodet, og at

man overkjører folks sivile rettigheter, og menneskerettigheter


Men det er kanskje ting som kommer senere, i valgkampen neste år osv?

Men jeg får i hvertfall ønske lykke til med det nye prinsipprogrammet, og si mange takk, for

at det i hvertfall er noen oppegående personer tilbake i Norge, for det synes jeg det bli litt

mangelvare på nå, hvis jeg skal være ærlig, så det synes jeg var et veldig bra og fornuftig

program, å komme med nå, fra Høyre!

Så beklager hvis jeg skriver mye her, jeg legger med noen linker, bare i tilfelle, at noen

har tid å lese dette.


Da håper dette er i orden, og igjen takk for at det dukker opp noen bra nyheter i mediene.

Så beklager jeg skrev for mye i denne e-posten, jeg bare fikk en ide, om at kunne jo prøve å

sende, en e-post i hvertfall, så da tenkte jeg at jeg kunne jo prøve å gjøre det.

Så da får jeg håpe, at det var i orden!

Med vennlig hilsen


Erik Ribsskog


PS.


Her er de nevnte linkene:

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/ (Dette er til bloggen min, som det er ca. 1700 innlegg på nå,

og som jeg holder på å indeksere ferdig, så dette burde forhåpentligvis være gjort innen ikke

alt for lenge).

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2008/02/lack-of-openness-from-government.html (Her er link,

til den posten på bloggen, hvor jeg har skrevet, om det jeg vet, om hva som egentlig foregår, noe

jeg gjerne skulle ha ønsket var mer).

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/6/86a/455 (Her er til siden min på linkedin, som jeg nettopp har

skaffet meg, jeg har lagt inn arbeidserfaring, så det skulle være mulig å se der, at jeg er en

person, som har jobbet og studert hele livet, og som aldri vært kriminell, i det hele tatt, og

som det ikke burde være noen grunn, for politiet, å tulle med).

http://xiandos.info/Surveillance,_Psychotronics_and_(Gang-)Stalking_Operations (Her står det, om

begreper, som 'Street Theater', 'Group Stalking', og 'Mind Control'. Dette som står nevnt her, passer

veldig bra, med det jeg har opplevd selv, her i Liverpool, de siste par årene. Uten at jeg vet om dette

er styrt av noen lokale nettverk, eller om det er føderale, eller hva de kaller det i Storbritannia, som

jeg kanskje mistenker at det også kan være, og muligens også linket til nettverk i Norge, uten at

jeg skal påstå hvordan dette er, for sikkert).


About Me

My photo
Overhørte på Rimi Bjørndal, (jeg jobbet som butikksjef/leder i ti år, i mange forskjellige butikker), i 2003, at jeg var forfulgt av 'mafian', mm. Har etter dette ikke fått rettighetene mine, i mange saker. Blogger derfor om problemer med å få rettigheter, mm. Mine memoarer, (Min Bok 1-10), kan også finnes på johncons-blogg, (se: 'Etiketter'). Jeg blogger også om slektsforskning, (etter at min danskfødte mormor, som var etter adelige/kongelige, døde i 2009). Har også vært såvidt innom Høyre/Unge Høyre, i sin tid. Har også studert informasjonsbehandling/IT/Computing, (på NHI, HiO IU og University of Sunderland). Har også bakgrunn fra handel og kontor, (grunnkurs, økonomi med markedsføring og data). Er/var også i Heimevernet, (etter at jeg ble overført dit, etter førstegangstjeneste i infanteriet, (og en rep-øvelse i mob-hæren), i forbindelse med omorganiseringer, i Forsvaret, etter den kalde krigen). Blir også utsatt for mye nettmobbing, mm. johncons-blogg, (og mine memoarer og nettbutikk), er kjent fra TV-programmet Tweet4Tweet, i 2012, (selv om jeg måtte klage, for programmet var veldig useriøst/nedlatende, mm.).